Dupery vs Deception
On this page 1 section ›
This concept page does not yet have synthesis content. The extractor flagged it as a load-bearing concept; a future synthesis pass will populate it. The All Occurrences section below shows every place it appears in the corpus.
All occurrences
Where it appears in the corpus (1)
-
#01
Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience · Adrian Johnston & Catherine Malabou · p.233
13. > Affects Are Si gnifier s
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the Lacanian distinction between affects and signifiers collapses under the combined pressure of Freud and affective neuroscience: affects are not merely consciously felt feelings (Empfindungen) but can mislead as to *what* they are—not just why—which means the affect/signifier distinction is better understood as a distinction internal to the category of the signifier itself, yielding the "infinite judgment" that affects are signifiers.
Lacan distinguishes between 'dupery' (duperie) and 'deception' (tromperie). The latter implies a standard of representational accuracy or faithfulness vis-à-vis an extrarepresentational point of reference.