Novel concept 2 occurrences

Aggressivity

ELI5

Aggressivity isn't the same as hitting someone or acting violently — it's more like a hidden tension that's always there because we build our sense of self by copying and competing with others, so love and hate are always two sides of the same coin.

Definition

Aggressivity, as Lacan articulates it in Seminar I, is emphatically not to be conflated with aggression as an empirical, behavioural act. It names instead a structural tension internal to the imaginary register — a virtual, constitutive hostility that inheres in the very formation of the ego through the mirror stage. Because the ego is built on an alienating identification with an external specular image, it is from the outset locked in a dual, rivalrous relation with the other who supplies that image. The self-coherence that the ego borrows from the (m)other's reflected image is always also a site of potential dispossession: what sustains me can equally undo me. Aggressivity is the name for this underlying reversibility — the structural possibility that libidinal investment can flip into its opposite — rather than for any overt act of violence.

This distinction is theoretically precise: aggression is aggressivity actualised, discharged into the world at the "limit" of the virtual tension. Aggressivity as such remains latent, a constitutive feature of the imaginary relation between ego and ideal-ego, love and hate, narcissism and rivalry. It is what explains why the transition from primitive narcissistic libido to genital libido, organized around the Oedipal drama, is never smooth: the imaginary axis always threatens to short-circuit the symbolic mediation, re-activating the deadly rivalry of specular captation. Aggressivity is therefore not a clinical symptom to be treated but a structural constant of the imaginary, the shadow side of identification itself.

Place in the corpus

In jacques-lacan-seminar-1, the concept of aggressivity appears within Lacan's account of how "man's desire is the desire of the Other" operates simultaneously on the imaginary plane (specular captation and alienation) and the symbolic plane (mediation through the law and language). It is positioned as an elaboration of the Ego and Ideal Ego: because the ego is constituted through an alienating identification with a specular image, it carries within it an irreducible rivalrous tension toward any other who occupies a similar imaginary position. This connects directly to the cross-referenced concept of Alienation — the ego's imaginary alienation (borrowing its unity from an external image) is precisely the ground on which aggressivity grows; the self-dispossession built into identification always carries a potential hostility toward the other who is both model and rival.

Aggressivity also articulates with Desire and the Death Drive. If desire is structured as the desire of the Other and is constitutively lacking, then the imaginary relation — in which the other seems to possess what I lack — generates envy and aggression as structural byproducts. This aligns with the Death Drive's logic of repetition and the mortification of the ego: aggressivity can be read as the imaginary expression of the death drive's pressure on the ego, the force that threatens to dissolve the specular unity that the ego depends upon. The concept functions in the corpus as a specification and imaginary-register concretisation of the broader structural principles of Alienation and the Death Drive, showing how abstract structural tensions materialise as affective dispositions within the intersubjective field.

Key formulations

Seminar I · Freud's Papers on TechniqueJacques Lacan · 1953 (p.181)

We must gain a deeper appreciation of the notion of aggressivity, which we use in such a brutal fashion. People believe that aggressivity is aggression. It has got absolutely nothing to do with it. At the limit, virtually, aggressivity turns into aggression.

The phrase "at the limit, virtually" is theoretically decisive: it establishes aggressivity as a structural-virtual dimension that only contingently crosses the threshold into actual aggression, insisting on a categorical difference between a constitutive imaginary tension ("aggressivity") and its empirical discharge ("aggression") — a distinction that reframes violence not as a natural impulse but as the occasional actualisation of an always-present structural condition.

All occurrences

Where it appears in the corpus (2)

  1. #01

    An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans

    <span id="9781134780112_Part11.xhtml_ncx_9"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part11.xhtml_page_0025"></span>***A*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part11.xhtml_ncx_15"></span>**aggressivity**

    Theoretical move: Lacan's concept of aggressivity is theorized as a fundamental imaginary relation rooted in the mirror stage and narcissism, distinct from mere aggression and from Freud's death drive, and is given clinical significance as negative transference that must be mobilized early in treatment.

    aggressivity is just as present, Lacan argues, in apparently loving acts as in violent ones; it 'underlies the activity of the philanthropist, the idealist, the pedagogue, and even the reformer'
  2. #02

    Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.181

    **XIV**

    Theoretical move: Lacan articulates how "man's desire is the desire of the other" operates on two distinct planes—the imaginary (specular captation and alienation) and the symbolic (mediation through language/law)—and shows how the transition between primitive narcissistic libido and genital libido, organized around the Oedipal drama, explains the reversibility of love and hate and the role of the ego's imaginary function.

    We must gain a deeper appreciation of the notion of aggressivity, which we use in such a brutal fashion. People believe that aggressivity is aggression. It has got absolutely nothing to do with it. At the limit, virtually, aggressivity turns into aggression.