Novel concept lacan 6 occurrences

Imago

On this page 5 sections ›

ELI5

An imago is like a mental snapshot you carry around of an important person in your life — a fixed inner image of, say, your mother or father — that shapes how you feel and behave in relationships, often without you realizing it.

Definition

The imago, in Lacan's pre-1950 writings, designates an imaginary stereotype — a fixed, unconscious representational formation tied to a specific person (typically a parental or sibling figure) that shapes the subject's affective and identificatory life. Derived originally from Jung, where it functioned as a relatively neutral universal prototype, Lacan progressively transforms the concept by loading it with a fundamentally negative valence: the imago becomes a site of alienation, deception, and imaginary captivation. It is structurally linked to the mirror stage (the specular formation of the ego), to the fragmented body (the pre-mirror chaos against which imaginary unity is erected), and to the Oedipus complex (which organizes the field of familial imagos). The imago thus names the minimal unit of imaginary identification — not yet a complex, but the irreducible stereotyped image of one other that anchors a subject's psychic structure.

The imago is closely coupled with, yet distinct from, the concept of the complex. Where the imago is a discrete imaginary stereotype relating to a single person, the complex is a whole constellation of interacting imagos operating together as a culturally-conditioned substitute for instinct. After 1950, Lacan effectively subsumes the imago under the broader category of "image," as the Symbolic register and the concept of the signifier come to dominate his theorization, displacing the early emphasis on imaginary prototypes. The imago therefore marks an early, transitional moment in Lacan's conceptual development — one in which the structuring role of the Other is grasped primarily through imaginary, identificatory formations rather than through the signifying chain.

Place in the corpus

Both occurrences of the concept appear in evans-dylan-an-introductory-dictionary-of-lacanian-psychoanalysis-taylor-francis, where it is treated as a key term of Lacan's early (pre-1950) theoretical vocabulary. Within the source's argument, the imago sits at the intersection of several major canonical concepts. It is the elementary unit out of which the complex is composed — the complex being a constellation of imagos — and it is co-extensive with the Imaginary register: the imago is precisely the kind of specular, ego-level, dyadic formation that the Imaginary designates. Its negative and alienating character directly echoes Alienation as theorized in the Lacanian corpus: the imago captures the subject in a borrowed image, producing méconnaissance rather than genuine self-knowledge. The imago's role in the Mirror Stage is also structural — the mirror stage itself can be read as the moment in which the foundational maternal imago is constituted, unifying the previously fragmented body image into a specular gestalt that is nonetheless foreign and external.

In relation to Identification, the imago names the imaginary (specular/narcissistic) pole — identification with an Ideal Ego, with i(a) — rather than the symbolic, unary-trait form of identification. The imago is thus a specification of imaginary identification, the concrete stereotyped image through which that identification operates. Its connection to the Oedipus Complex and Castration situates the imago within the broader field of familial triangulation: the paternal and maternal imagos are the building blocks of the Oedipal drama before Lacan recasts that drama in fully signifying, symbolic terms. The imago's eventual disappearance from Lacan's lexicon after 1950 is itself theoretically significant — it marks the shift from an imaginary-centered to a symbolic-centered framework, in which the signifier, not the stereotyped image, becomes the primary operator of subjectivity.

Key formulations

An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian PsychoanalysisDylan Evans · 1996 (page unknown)

it is closely related to the IMAGO. Whereas the imago designates an imaginary stereotype relating to one person, the complex is a whole constellation of interacting images

The contrast between "imaginary stereotype relating to one person" and "a whole constellation of interacting images" is theoretically decisive: it establishes the imago as the atomic unit of imaginary identification — singular, fixed, person-bound — while showing that psychological complexity (the complex) is always a relational, plural structure built from multiple imagos. The word "stereotype" further signals the rigidity and deceptive fixity that align the imago with Lacan's broader account of imaginary captivation and alienation.

All occurrences

Where it appears in the corpus (6)

#01

An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans

***I*** > **imago**

Theoretical move: The passage traces the concept of 'imago' from its Jungian origins through Lacan's early theoretical deployment, showing how Lacan transforms the imago from a neutral universal prototype into a fundamentally negative, alienating and deceptive structure tied to the mirror stage, the fragmented body, and the Oedipus complex — before the term is absorbed into 'image' after 1950.

The term 'imago' occupies a central role in Lacan's pre-1950 writings, where it is closely related to the term COMPLEX.
#02

An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans

***C*** > **Complex**

Theoretical move: The passage traces Lacan's early concept of the 'complex' as a culturally-produced constellation of imaginary identifications that substitutes for natural instincts, articulating three family complexes (weaning, intrusion, Oedipus) before the concept is gradually displaced by the Oedipus and castration complexes in his mature work.

it is closely related to the IMAGO. Whereas the imago designates an imaginary stereotype relating to one person, the complex is a whole constellation of interacting images
#03

Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English · Jacques Lacan · p.89

JACQUES LACAN ECRITS > *The Truth of Psychology and the Psychology of Truth* 79 > *The Object of Psychology Is Defined in Essentially Relativistic Terms*

Theoretical move: The passage argues that psychoanalytic concepts—particularly identification, the complex, imago, and libido—constitute a genuinely relativistic (rather than merely subjective) psychological science, and distinguishes two uses of libido (energetic vs. substantialist) to show how analytic theory can advance toward positive knowledge of psychical reality.

if, with the term 'imago,' he did not fully extract it from the confused state of everyday intuition, he nevertheless masterfully exploited its concrete importance, preserving the entirety of its informational function in intuition, memory, and development.
#04

Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English · Jacques Lacan · p.162

Presentation on Psychical Causality > /. *Critique of an Organicist Theory of Madness, Henri Ey's Organo-Dynamism* > *2. The Essential Causality of Madness*

Theoretical move: Lacan argues that madness is not a contingent organic defect but the "permanent virtuality of a gap opened up in [man's] essence," constituting freedom's faithful shadow—the very limit of freedom that man bears within himself—thereby grounding psychical causality in an ontological structure rather than biology, and proposing the concept of "imagos" as the scientific form of this causality.

I will now try to grasp the mode of form and action that establishes the determinations of this drama, since I think it can be identified scientifically with the concept of 'imagos.'
#05

Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English · Jacques Lacan · p.165

Presentation on Psychical Causality > *3. The Psychical Effects of the Imaginary Mode*

Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the ego is constituted through imaginary identificatory structures (the imago, transitivism, and the mirror stage) rather than through any organismic or synthetic function, and that alienation in the other is the primordial form of self-experience—a claim that grounds a Hegelian-inflected theory of desire and mediates between the biological and the social via the Oedipus complex.

We already see here an essential feature of an imago: the observable effects of a form, in the broadest sense of the term, that can only be defined in terms of generic resemblance, thus implying that a certain recognition occurred prior to that.
#06

Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English · Jacques Lacan · p.171

Presentation on Psychical Causality > *3. The Psychical Effects of the Imaginary Mode*

Theoretical move: Lacan grounds psychical causality in the concept of the imago and identification, arguing that the mirror stage reveals a primordial alienation of the ego from being — a narcissistic-suicidal knot that underlies madness — and advances biological evidence (pigeon ovulation, locust gregariousness triggered by visual form-perception) to establish the imago as a genuinely causal, irreducible psychical object on par with Galileo's mass point in physics.

I think, therefore, that I can designate the imago as the true object of psychology, to the exact same extent that Galileo's notion of the inert mass point served as the foundation of physics.