Imaginary Order
ELI5
The Imaginary Order is the part of our mental world built around images and mirrors — how we see ourselves, how we compare ourselves to others, and the rivalries and fascinations that follow. It is the register of the ego and its endless, often aggressive game of "same or different" with the people around us.
Definition
The Imaginary Order is one of Lacan's three fundamental registers (alongside the Symbolic and the Real) that together structure psychical life and human experience. It is the register of the image, of the ego and its objects, of specular identification, and of the dyadic relation between self and other. Grounded in the Mirror Stage, the Imaginary is constituted by the infant's jubilant (mis)recognition of its own body image in the mirror: this encounter produces the ego as an alienated, external, unified form that the fragmented, uncoordinated organism grasps as itself. The resulting ego is thus primordially narcissistic, organised around an image that is simultaneously the self and a foreign other. The Imaginary is therefore the domain of amour-propre, rivalrous self-love, aggressivity, fascination, and misrecognition (méconnaissance): to be captured in the Imaginary is to be locked in a zero-sum, binary logic of same/different, love/hate, where the other is always either a reflection of oneself or a rival to be destroyed. Perceptually, the Imaginary is the order of Gestalt recognition, of "good form," of intuition, and of the body image as anchor for the subject's comprehensive identity.
The Imaginary does not exist in isolation. In Lacan's tripartite topology, it is always already articulated with the Symbolic and the Real. The Symbolic order regulates the Imaginary: in the optical schema of the inverted bouquet, the inclination of the plane mirror—which determines whether the real image is seen coherently—is governed by the voice and law of the symbolic Other. Without this symbolic regulation, the Imaginary produces only the pathological impasses of the dyadic relation: perversion collapses into the mutual annihilation of desire, neurosis is trapped in imaginary manoeuvres along the a–a' axis, and love "subducts" the symbolic by collapsing Ego-Ideal into Ideal Ego. In Lacan's late topology, the three registers are held together as a Borromean knot; the Imaginary is associated with consistency, the Symbolic with the hole, and the Real with ek-sistence. The Imaginary's characteristic "stickiness"—its tendency to trap cognition in the sphere-and-cross figure of the body—is what makes it simultaneously indispensable to human existence and a structural obstacle to formalisation and symbolic realisation.
Evolution
In Lacan's early work (Seminars I–IV, the "return to Freud" period), the Imaginary is primarily characterised as the register of the ego and the mirror stage. Here the key move is to show that the ego is not a psychological agent but an object — an alienated image constituted from outside. The Imaginary is the plane of dyadic rivalry, narcissism, and amour-propre; its paradigm is the L-schema, where the a–a' axis (ego to alter-ego) runs over and resists the Symbolic axis (S to O). At this stage, the Imaginary is "the regime of alienation" proper, and the Symbolic is positioned as its corrective resource — the dimension that breaks the fatal binary of the imaginary dual relation and allows genuinely intersubjective speech. The critique of ego psychology, object-relations theory (Fairbairn, Balint, Klein), and the IPA's institutional culture all converge on the charge that these schools remain trapped in the Imaginary by reducing analysis to a two-body, two-ego encounter.
In the middle period (Seminars V–XI), the Symbolic takes on greater theoretical weight and becomes increasingly the primary register of alienation — the big Other as the "policeman of meaning" rather than the liberating resource it was in the early seminars. The Imaginary's role is somewhat more complex here: it provides the necessary "ballast" for human language (the body image, natural symbols, emotional resonance), but it is explicitly not homogeneous with the Symbolic. Object-relations approaches that "reduce analysis to the emphasis on imaginary themes" are criticised as perversions of psychoanalysis. The objet petit a begins to be distinguished from purely imaginary objects: envy (invidia) is not a jealousy of need but a confrontation with an imaginary completeness attributed to the Other, pointing toward the non-specular real object that will fully emerge as the a in Seminar XI.
In the late period (Seminars XX–XXIII, the topology and Borromean phase), the three registers are fully symmetrised as equivalent rings of the Borromean knot. The Imaginary is now defined by consistency — the cord's material thickness, the body's rooted cogitation, the sphere-and-cross figure that traps imagination. Progress "within the Imaginary" (gaining consistency) is distinguished from properly structural progress. The Imaginary is shown to be a source of mathematical difficulty (the infinitesimal) and of topological entanglement: people naturally "flatten" the Borromean knot back into an imaginary diagram of two overlapping circles. Joyce's sinthome is introduced precisely as a fourth term that supplements and repairs the knotting of RSI where the Imaginary's stickiness has prevented it from doing its topological work. Secondary literature (Boothby, Fink, Hook et al.) largely follows this trajectory, with Boothby emphasising the dialectic of imaginary formation/deformation linked to the death drive, and Fink emphasising the binary same/different logic that defines imaginary relations at their most basic.
Key formulations
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique (p.146)
Love is a phenomenon which takes place on the imaginary level, and which provokes a veritable subduction of the symbolic, a sort of annihilation, of perturbation of the function of the ego-ideal.
This formulation captures the pathological power of the Imaginary: love as an imaginary event overwhelms symbolic regulation, collapsing the ego-ideal into the ideal ego and thereby disrupting the subject's orientation in the symbolic order.
The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance (p.104)
'Imaginary relations' are not illusory relationships-relationships that don't really exist-but rather relations between egos, wherein everything is played out in terms of but one opposition: same or different.
Fink's formulation provides the clearest structural definition of the Imaginary Order as a register of binary ego-logic, distinguishing it from both 'illusion' in the everyday sense and the properly differential logic of the Symbolic.
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (p.312)
Is this imaginary homogeneous with the symbolic? No. And it would be a perversion of the meaning of psychoanalysis to reduce it to an emphasis on these imaginary themes, to the coaptation of the subject by an elective, privileged, prevailing object.
A pivotal polemical statement that establishes the irreducibility of the Imaginary to the Symbolic — and vice versa — while simultaneously diagnosing the object-relations school as a systematic confusion of the two registers.
Theory Keywords (p.39)
The imaginary is the realm of the ego, a pre-linguistic realm of sense perception, identification and an illusory sense of unity.
This secondary-literature formulation synthesises the standard Lacanian characterisation of the Imaginary Order across the corpus, linking ego-formation, mirror identification, and constitutive illusion of unity as its three defining features.
Seminar XXII · R.S.I. (p.134)
It is hard to imagine the degree to which the Imaginary is sticky and has a stickiness that I am right away going to designate, that of the sphere and of the cross.
A formulation from the late topological period that shifts the characterisation of the Imaginary from specular dyadic rivalry to a geometric-topological captivity — the sphere-and-cross as the default form in which imagination is always already snared.
Cited examples
The case of Dick (Melanie Klein's patient) (case_study)
Cited by Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique (p.91). Dick's case illustrates the dependency of the Imaginary on symbolic articulation: his imaginary world is impoverished ('the extreme restrictedness of the imaginary domain') precisely because he has not been symbolically integrated. Klein's therapeutic intervention — grafting Oedipal symbolisation onto his imaginary inertia — demonstrates that the imaginary only becomes operative when regulated by the Symbolic.
Molière's Amphitryon / the Sosie myth (literature)
Cited by Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (p.276). The Sosie myth — in which the ego encounters its own double at the door — is Lacan's theatrical illustration of the fundamentally alienated, specular character of the ego. The comedy stages the imaginary structure of ego-identity: Sosie is the ego who meets himself ('me, who kicks you out'), revealing how the ego is always constituted through and against its mirror image, making genuine self-possession impossible within the imaginary register alone.
Ethological experiments on the dominance of the image in sexual releasing mechanisms (Lorenz/Tinbergen research on pigeons and Gestalt stimuli) (other)
Cited by Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique (p.127). Lacan uses the finding that a pigeon can develop sexually when shown only the image of another pigeon to ground the Imaginary Order in ethological evidence: the image (Gestalt), not the real partner, is primary in the sexual cycle, demonstrating that the libido is structurally centred on the imaginary register.
Velázquez's Las Meninas (art)
Cited by Seminar XIII · The Object of Psychoanalysis (p.234). Lacan contrasts 'bad painters' who produce only their own portrait (pure imaginary self-reflection) with Velázquez, whose painting is not a mirage but a 'trap for the look.' Las Meninas demonstrates that great pictorial work exceeds the imaginary register of mirage and self-portrait by structuring the gaze through the non-specular logic of the objet a.
Freud's Signorelli parapraxis (the painter's name forgotten during a conversation about death and sexuality) (case_study)
Cited by Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan (p.85). Boothby uses the Signorelli episode to demonstrate how repression operates at the fault line between Imaginary and Symbolic: the imaginary presentation (the painter's portrait) is over-invested, blocking the word-presentation (Signorelli's name) and showing how the Imaginary captures and truncates the symbolic chain.
Cybernetic machine's failure to recognise 'good form' (Gestalt) vs. human intuitive recognition (other)
Cited by Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (p.322). Lacan uses the contrast between the machine's point-by-point scanning and human Gestalt recognition to illustrate the Imaginary/Symbolic distinction empirically: what counts as the simplest form for the human imaginary (good form) requires the most complex symbolic formula for the machine, providing 'sufficient indication in experience of the opposition between the imaginary and the symbolic.'
David Lynch's Wild at Heart — Lula's bond with her mother Marietta (film)
Cited by The Impossible David Lynch (p.69). McGowan reads Lula's investment in her mother Marietta as an investment in imaginary authority — contrasted with Sailor's investment in symbolic/phallic authority — mapping the two protagonists' failure to commit to fantasy onto the two different registers and demonstrating how imaginary capture prevents full engagement with desire.
Tensions
Within the corpus
Whether the Imaginary is primarily the register of alienation (from which the Symbolic liberates) or whether both registers are equally alienating and the Imaginary has its own irreducible structural necessity.
Boothby (Diaeresis): In Lacan's first phase, 'the imaginary is taken to be the regime of alienation for which the resources of the symbolic serve the interests of the unconscious desire of the subject' — the Symbolic is the corrective to imaginary capture. — cite: diaeresis-richard-boothby-embracing-the-void-rethinking-the-origin-of-the-sacred p. 220
Lacan (Seminar 2, p. 312): The imaginary is not homogeneous with the symbolic, but equally, reducing psychoanalysis to the symbolic at the expense of imaginary themes is 'a perversion of the meaning of psychoanalysis'; the imaginary provides an irreducible 'ballast' for human language through the images of the body, the sun, and the moon that give language its 'weight, resources, and emotional vibration.' — cite: jacques-lacan-seminar-2 p. 312
This tension marks a genuine shift in Lacan's own teaching, from using the Symbolic therapeutically against the Imaginary to treating the two as structurally co-necessary.
Whether the imaginary is inaccessible in its original form (making developmental claims about the child's imaginary world suspect) or whether it is directly observable in the child's behaviour.
Lacan (Seminar 1, p. 221): 'If you think that the child is more a captive of the imaginary than of the rest, you are right in a certain sense. The imaginary is there. But it is completely inaccessible to us.' The imaginary in the child can only be reached retrospectively through symbolic realisations in the adult. — cite: jacques-lacan-seminar-1 p. 221
Lacan (Seminar 1, p. 175): Gesell's film of infants at the mirror — which Gesell made without any knowledge of the mirror stage — shows that 'the infant's jubilation in front of the mirror throughout the whole of this period' is directly observable, and that 'the significant moment' is 'its dissolution at eighteen months', demonstrating the empirical tractability of the imaginary developmental moment. — cite: jacques-lacan-seminar-1 p. 175
This is a tension internal to the same seminar, between Lacan's epistemological caution about retrospective projection and his appeal to Gesell's ethological film as direct empirical confirmation.
Whether the Imaginary order is structurally prior to and pre-dated by the Symbolic, or whether the two co-emerge.
Lacan (Seminar 2, p. 265): 'The symbolic relation is constituted as early as possible, even prior to the fixation of the self image of the subject, prior to the structuring image of the ego.' The Symbolic precedes and conditions the imaginary structuring of the ego-image. — cite: jacques-lacan-seminar-2 p. 265
Fink (The Lacanian Subject, p. 56): 'It is primarily due to the parents' reaction to such images that they become charged, in the child's eyes, with libidinal interest or value — which is why mirror images are not of great interest to the child prior to about six months of age, in other words, prior to the functioning of language in the child.' This implies a simultaneous co-constitution rather than a strict symbolic priority. — cite: the-lacanian-subject-between-l-bruce-fink p. 56
Both positions agree the Symbolic is necessary for imaginary investment, but differ on whether there is a genuine structural precedence or only an analytic distinction.
Across frameworks
vs Ego Psychology
Lacanian: For Lacan, the ego is not an adaptive agency to be strengthened but an imaginary formation — an alienated, external image with which the subject is fascinated and captivated. Ego psychology's goal of 'strengthening the ego' is a therapeutic dead end: it merely reinforces imaginary identification and amplifies the very narcissistic, rivalrous passions that analysis should dissolve. The analytic dyad, if structured around the analyst's ego as a model, simply intensifies the imaginary dual relation and forecloses the symbolic dimension.
Ego Psychology: Ego psychology (Hartmann, Kris, Loewenstein) positions the ego as an autonomous synthetic agency with conflict-free spheres that the analyst should ally with and strengthen. The therapeutic goal is to restore adaptive functioning by helping the ego manage drive demands, reality, and superego through the 'working alliance.' The analyst's relatively 'healthy' ego provides a model for identification and reality-testing.
Fault line: The deep disagreement concerns the ontological status of the ego: for Lacan it is constitutively imaginary and alienated, making ego-strengthening a form of pathology-reinforcement; for ego psychology it is the seat of adaptive reality-engagement, making ego-strengthening the curative mechanism.
vs Object Oriented Ontology
Lacanian: The Imaginary Order is not a feature of objects themselves but of the subject's specular relation to its own image — a dimension of misrecognition that attaches to objects insofar as they are constituted through the ego's imaginary capture. Objects in the Imaginary are always correlates of the ego (a and a'), not independent entities. The Real object (objet a) is specifically what resists imaginary absorption.
Object Oriented Ontology: Object-Oriented Ontology (Harman) insists that objects have withdrawn, real depths that no relation — including perception or cognition — can exhaust. Objects are not constituted by subjects; they exist in themselves regardless of how they appear to any observer, human or otherwise. The 'sensual' qualities of objects (roughly analogous to what Lacan might call imaginary presentations) are real aspects of the object's relational existence, not distortions imposed by a subject.
Fault line: OOO insists on the autonomous reality of objects and denies subject-constituted 'misrecognition' as a category; Lacanian theory insists that imaginary objects are always already constituted through the ego's alienating capture, making the object's 'independence' a function of its objet-a structure rather than its inherent withdrawal.
vs Humanistic Self Actualization
Lacanian: Lacan's Imaginary Order reveals that the 'unified self' toward which humanistic psychology aims is itself an imaginary formation — a fascinated capture in an alienated mirror image. The drive toward coherent self-actualization is not a movement toward authentic being but a reinforcement of the ego's fundamental misrecognition. There is no pre-given authentic self to actualise; the subject is constitutively split, and 'unity' is always an imaginary illusion.
Humanistic Self Actualization: Humanistic psychology (Maslow, Rogers) posits an intrinsic organismic wisdom and drive toward self-actualization. The therapist's task is to provide the unconditional positive regard that allows the client's authentic self to emerge and fulfil its potential. Psychological distress results from distorted self-concepts and unmet growth needs, not from constitutive structural splits.
Fault line: The fault line is the status of unity and coherence: humanistic psychology treats coherent self-experience as the goal and criterion of health, while Lacanian theory treats it as the symptomatic expression of imaginary capture — the very illusion that analysis should deconstruct.
All occurrences
Where it appears in the corpus (96)
-
#01
Reading Lacan's Écrits: From 'The Freudian Thing' to 'Remarks on Daniel Lagache' · Derek Hook, Calum Neill & Stijn Vanheule (eds.) · p.43
[The Freudian Thing, or the Meaning of the Return to Freud in Psychoanalysis](#ch05.xhtml_tocbook-part-003) > Imaginary passion
Theoretical move: The passage argues that Lacan's mirror stage grounds the ego in a constitutive double alienation—imaginary and symbolic—such that the ego is structurally paranoid, narcissistic, and rivalrous, making ego-to-ego analysis (as in ego psychology) a therapeutic dead end that merely amplifies imaginary passions rather than dissolving the transference.
the dyadic ego-to-ego relationship... Ego and alter-ego do not smoothly move in complementary synch with each other; they are inevitably locked in a head-to-head contest
-
#02
Reading Lacan's Écrits: From 'The Freudian Thing' to 'Remarks on Daniel Lagache' · Derek Hook, Calum Neill & Stijn Vanheule (eds.)
[Psychoanalysis and its Teaching](#ch05.xhtml_tocbook-part-004) > The imaginary in neurosis and object relations
Theoretical move: The passage argues that neurotic impasses (hysterical and obsessional) are constituted entirely within the imaginary register—between little others and ego-images—and therefore cannot be resolved from within that register; the hysteric perpetuates an alienated desire mediated through the other's image while the obsessive deploys his ego as a puppet to stave off death, both strategies ultimately annulling desire and blocking genuine subjective engagement.
Hence, the knight's changing places with a projection of the other occurs along the imaginary axis.
-
#03
Reading Lacan's Écrits: From 'The Freudian Thing' to 'Remarks on Daniel Lagache' · Derek Hook, Calum Neill & Stijn Vanheule (eds.) · p.97
[Psychoanalysis and its Teaching](#ch05.xhtml_tocbook-part-004) > Freud’s desire
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the IPA's reduction of psychoanalytic training to standardized technique (rather than a humanistic, symbolic "style") constitutes the repression of Freudian truth, and that the only genuine transmission of psychoanalysis is through a demonstrative style that enacts the very mechanisms of the unconscious it describes — not through institutional affiliation or positivist technique.
Freud, then, had a desire (conscious or otherwise) to make his work difficult to engage by virtue of an imaginary roadblock—de rigueur identifications with an image of Freud and his institution
-
#04
Reading Lacan's Écrits: From 'The Freudian Thing' to 'Remarks on Daniel Lagache' · Derek Hook, Calum Neill & Stijn Vanheule (eds.) · p.224
[The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power](#ch05.xhtml_tocbook-part-008) > III. Where do we stand regarding transference?
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the "central defect" of post-Freudian theories of transference (genetic/ego-psychological, object-relational, and intersubjective-introjective) is their reduction of the analytic situation to a dual, imaginary relationship, thereby neglecting the symbolic order and the constitutive impasse of desire; against these, Lacan insists that the direction of treatment must be oriented by the patient's signifiers rather than any normalizing ideal of adaptation or harmonious object-love.
Lacan's main criticism, and the central defect he sees in all of the above theories, is that they focus solely on the imaginary, on a dual analytic relationship. Instead Lacan stresses the symbolic and the crucial meaning of the signifier
-
#05
Reading Lacan's Écrits: From 'The Freudian Thing' to 'Remarks on Daniel Lagache' · Derek Hook, Calum Neill & Stijn Vanheule (eds.)
[The Direction of the Treatment and the Principles of its Power](#ch05.xhtml_tocbook-part-008) > IV. How to act with one’s being?
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the analyst's proper mode of being cannot be derived from technical rules, happiness, or comprehension, but must be grounded in the ethics of desire — specifically the desire of the analyst — and that the analyst's stance toward the analysand's demand (intransitive, without object) is the pivot around which the direction of treatment turns.
In Lacan's early work the Freudian ego belongs to the imaginary order, while the subject is the subject of the unconscious, as described by Freud with his notion of the Id
-
#06
Reading Lacan's Écrits: From 'The Freudian Thing' to 'Remarks on Daniel Lagache' · Derek Hook, Calum Neill & Stijn Vanheule (eds.)
[The Freudian Thing, or the Meaning of the Return to Freud in Psychoanalysis](#ch05.xhtml_tocbook-part-003) > Analytic action
Theoretical move: The L-schema is deployed to argue that the fundamental axis of analytic action is the Symbolic (between unconscious subjects), not the Imaginary (between egos), and that the analyst's strategic self-effacement/silence opens space for the unconscious to speak by dissolving the transference and instantiating the symbolic order as condition of possibility for the analysand's speech.
In Lacan's register-theoretic terms, the Imaginary axis of the 'L-schema' runs over and resists its Symbolic axis.
-
#07
Embracing the Void: Rethinking the Origin of the Sacred · Richard Boothby · p.220
Rethinking Religion (or, What Is the Sacred?) > Notes > Chapter 2
Theoretical move: This notes passage traces a conceptual evolution in Lacan's use of "the big Other" across two phases of his teaching—from a term pointing toward genuine alterity and unconscious desire to one designating the defensive, meaning-policing function of the symbolic—while linking this shift to the broader move from imaginary to symbolic alienation.
an initial phase in which the imaginary is taken to be the regime of alienation for which the resources of the symbolic serve the interests of the unconscious desire of the subject
-
#08
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part23.xhtml_ncx_113"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part23.xhtml_page_0132"></span>***M*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part23.xhtml_ncx_119"></span>***méconnaissance***
Theoretical move: Méconnaissance is theorized not as mere ignorance but as an imaginary misrecognition of a symbolic knowledge the subject already possesses, structurally homologous between neurotic ego-formation and paranoiac delusion, making all connaissance 'paranoiac knowledge'.
in the imaginary order, self-knowledge (me-connaissance) is synonymous with misunderstanding (méconnaissance)
-
#09
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_ncx_134"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_page_0151"></span>***O*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_ncx_139"></span>**Optical model**
Theoretical move: The optical model serves as a provisional didactic apparatus that illustrates how the symbolic order structures the imaginary, and distinguishes the ideal ego (real image) from the ego-ideal (symbolic guide governing the mirror's angle), before Lacan replaces optical models with topology to escape imaginary capture.
The optical model illustrates the way that the position of the subject in the symbolic order…determines the way in which the imaginary is articulated with the real.
-
#10
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part23.xhtml_ncx_113"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part23.xhtml_page_0132"></span>***M*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part23.xhtml_ncx_124"></span>**mirror Stage**
Theoretical move: The mirror stage is theorised not merely as a developmental moment but as a permanent structure of subjectivity that founds the ego through identification with the specular image, generates imaginary alienation and aggressive tension, and already contains a symbolic dimension in the figure of the big Other who ratifies the image.
by the early 1950s Lacan no longer regards it simply as a moment in the life of the infant, but sees it as also representing a permanent structure of subjectivity, the paradigm of the IMAGINARY order
-
#11
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_ncx_87"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_page_0105"></span>***I*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_ncx_90"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_page_0108"></span>**imaginary**
Theoretical move: The Imaginary order is defined not as mere illusion but as a structurally necessary, symbolically conditioned register whose basis is the mirror-stage ego-formation; the passage argues that reducing psychoanalysis to the imaginary (identification with the analyst, dual relationship) betrays the symbolic essence of analytic work, and that the only therapeutic purchase on the imaginary comes through its translation into the symbolic.
From 1953 on, the imaginary becomes one of the three ORDERS which constitute the tripartite scheme at the centre of Lacanian thought, being opposed to the symbolic and the real.
-
#12
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part22.xhtml_ncx_104"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part22.xhtml_page_0122"></span>***L*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part22.xhtml_ncx_112"></span>**lure**
Theoretical move: Lacan distinguishes animal lures (operating purely in service of need, within the imaginary) from the properly human lure, which involves a "double deception" made possible only by language, thereby grounding the specifically human dimension of deception in the Symbolic rather than the Imaginary.
Lures are part of the imaginary order. Thus the seductive manoeuvres of the child in the preoedipal triangle (when the child tries to be the phallus for the mother) are described as lures
-
#13
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_195"></span>**Subject**
Theoretical move: The passage traces the theoretical genealogy of Lacan's concept of the 'subject', arguing that it is irreducibly distinct from the ego, constituted through language and the symbolic order, essentially split, and identified with the Cartesian cogito reread as the subject of the unconscious rather than self-conscious agency.
the ego is part of the imaginary order, the subject is part of the symbolic.
-
#14
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_ncx_142"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_page_0161"></span>***P*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_ncx_160"></span>**psychosis**
Theoretical move: The passage establishes the Lacanian theory of psychosis as a clinical structure defined by foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father, producing a hole in the symbolic order and imprisoning the subject in the imaginary; it further articulates the later reformulation via the Borromean Knot and the role of the sinthome as a fourth ring.
the imaginary mechanism is what gives psychotic alienation its form, but not its dynamics
-
#15
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_ncx_87"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_page_0105"></span>***I*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part19.xhtml_ncx_89"></span>**identification**
Theoretical move: The passage maps Lacan's theory of identification as a two-tier structure (imaginary/symbolic) grounded in the mirror stage and Oedipus complex respectively, then traces Lacan's progressive reframing of symbolic identification as identification with the signifier (unary trait/S1), and concludes by contrasting false identificatory ends of analysis with the genuine end as subjective destitution and identification with the sinthome.
Imaginary identification is the mechanism by which the ego is created in the MIRROR STAGE; it belongs absolutely to the imaginary order.
-
#16
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part28.xhtml_ncx_164"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part28.xhtml_page_0186"></span>***R*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part28.xhtml_ncx_165"></span>**real**
Theoretical move: The passage traces the genealogy and theoretical transformations of Lacan's concept of the Real across his career: from an early ontological absolute opposed to appearance, through its elevation to one of the three fundamental orders in 1953 as that which resists symbolisation absolutely, to its late-Lacan distinction from 'reality'—all while maintaining a constitutive indeterminacy (internal/external, unknowable/rational) that is itself theoretically productive.
the real is thus no longer simply opposed to the imaginary, but is also located beyond the symbolic
-
#17
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_185"></span>**Signification**
Theoretical move: Lacan's concept of 'signification' undergoes a trajectory from a vague association with meaningfulness to a precise, imaginary-order process in which the play of signifiers produces the illusion of the signified through metonymy and metaphor, with the bar in the Saussurean algorithm marking not a bond but a rupture—a theoretical move that radically inverts Saussure's stable sign relation.
it is from 1957 on that Lacan's use of the term takes on a direct reference to the Saussurean concept, and shifts from the symbolic to the imaginary order.
-
#18
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_200"></span>**Symbolic**
Theoretical move: The passage defines the Symbolic as the central order in Lacan's tripartite schema, arguing that it constitutes the essentially linguistic, law-governed, and totalising dimension of human subjectivity—irreducible to biology, structuring the Imaginary, and encompassing the Unconscious, the Other, the Death Drive, and Lack—while distinguishing it sharply from Freud's 'symbolism' as fixed bi-univocal meaning.
The symbolic is the realm of culture as opposed to the imaginary order of nature. Whereas the imaginary is characterised by dual relations, the symbolic is characterised by triadic structures
-
#19
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_ncx_134"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_page_0151"></span>***O*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_ncx_141"></span>**other/Other**
Theoretical move: The passage establishes the fundamental Lacanian distinction between the little other (imaginary counterpart/ego-reflection) and the big Other (symbolic order, radical alterity, locus of speech), arguing that the big Other as symbolic order is primary over the big Other as subject, and that the unconscious is the discourse of the Other.
The little other is thus entirely inscribed in the imaginary order.
-
#20
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_ncx_134"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_page_0151"></span>***O*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part25.xhtml_ncx_138"></span>**Oedipus complex**
Theoretical move: The passage expounds Lacan's distinctive reworking of the Oedipus complex as a three-timed logical passage from the Imaginary to the Symbolic order, mediated by the paternal function and the phallus, arguing that the prohibition of jouissance operative in the Oedipal myth masks the more fundamental Lacanian insight (drawn from Totem and Taboo) that maternal jouissance is not merely forbidden but structurally impossible.
The first time of the Oedipus complex is characterised by the imaginary triangle of mother, child and phallus.
-
#21
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_ncx_142"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_page_0161"></span>***P*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_ncx_159"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part26.xhtml_page_0180"></span>**psychology**
Theoretical move: The passage traces Lacan's progressive dissociation of psychoanalysis from psychology: psychology is reduced to ethology/behaviourism and shown to be built on illusions (unity, wholeness, nature), while psychoanalysis alone, by uncovering the linguistic basis of subjectivity and the split subject, escapes those illusions and constitutes a genuinely human science.
psychology is dominated by the illusions of wholeness and synthesis, NATURE and instinct, autonomy and self-consciousness
-
#22
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_199"></span>**superego**
Theoretical move: The passage traces Lacan's progressive retheorization of the Freudian superego: from a symbolic agency tied to the Law and the Oedipus complex, to a paradoxical structure that is simultaneously the Law and its destruction, culminating in its identification with the Kantian categorical imperative and the jouissance-commanding voice of the Other.
fills out those gaps with an imaginary substitute that distorts the law
-
#23
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_176"></span>**Schema L**
Theoretical move: Schema L is Lacan's first and most sustained diagrammatic formalization of psychoanalytic structure, demonstrating that the symbolic relation between the Other and the subject is always partially blocked by the imaginary axis, while also representing the decentered subject stretched across four structural loci; it is positioned as the originary quaternary from which all subsequent schemata derive, and as the precursor to Lacan's mature topological work.
Because it has to pass through the imaginary 'wall of language', the discourse of the Other reaches the subject in an interrupted and inverted form.
-
#24
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.81
**vn**
Theoretical move: Lacan introduces the "inverted bouquet" optical apparatus as a model for understanding the articulation of the imaginary, symbolic, and real — arguing that the mirror stage requires supplementation by a structural optics that distinguishes real from virtual images, and that the juncture of symbolic and imaginary is constitutive of what we call "reality."
For there to be an optics, for each given point in real space, there must be one point and one corresponding point only in another space, which is the imaginary space.
-
#25
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.91
**vn**
Theoretical move: Using Melanie Klein's case of Dick, Lacan argues that the subject's entry into the human world is not a matter of ego development but of symbolic integration: the unconscious is the discourse of the Other, and it is the analyst's grafting of the Oedipal symbolisation onto the child's imaginary inertia that constitutes the therapeutic act—demonstrating that genuine speech, not language as such, is what coordinates the symbolic, imaginary, and real registers.
the imaginary and real begin to be structured, how the successive investments develop, investments which delineate the variety of human, that is nameable, objects.
-
#26
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.146
**XI**
Theoretical move: Lacan deploys the optical schema to articulate the structural difference between the Ideal Ego (Idealich) and the Ego-Ideal (Ichideal): the imaginary is regulated by the symbolic (governed by the voice/speech of the Other), and love/transference are theorised as perturbations of that symbolic regulation—love confusing the two registers, transference exploiting the same imaginary mechanism but within the analytic symbolic frame.
Love is a phenomenon which takes place on the imaginary level, and which provokes a veritable subduction of the symbolic, a sort of annihilation, of perturbation of the function of the ego-ideal.
-
#27
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.225
xvra > **The symbolic order**
Theoretical move: The passage argues that perverse desire, structured around the imaginary dyadic relation, necessarily dissolves into an impasse (annihilation of either subject or object), and that escaping this impasse requires the symbolic order — demonstrated by showing that the Master/Slave dialectic, though mythically imaginary in origin, is always already bounded by symbolic/numerical structuration, which underpins the intersubjective field and language itself.
The intersubjective relation which subtends perverse desire is only sustained by the annihilation either of the desire of the other, or of the desire of the subject.
-
#28
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.221
**XVII**
Theoretical move: The passage argues that intersubjectivity is not grounded in imaginary dyadic relation but in the symbolic function itself: the child's use of language (naming, presence/absence) demonstrates that the symbolic and the real are primary, with the imaginary only becoming accessible retrospectively through adult realisation - thus critiquing object-relations theory (Balint) for missing the constitutive role of the symbolic.
If you think that the child is more a captive of the imaginary than of the rest, you are right in a certain sense. The imaginary is there. But it is completely inaccessible to us.
-
#29
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.175
**Xffl**
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the Mirror Stage inaugurates a fundamental imaginary alienation in which desire is projected onto the other, generating an irreducible aggression toward the other as the site of that alienation; the symbolic order (language, the Fort/Da game) is the only mediation that rescues the subject from the destructive logic of the imaginary dual relation, while also locating primary masochism and the death drive at the juncture of the imaginary and symbolic.
She simply displayed the most fundamental structure of the human being on the imaginary plane - to destroy the person who is the site of alienation.
-
#30
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.17
**I**
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the contemporary confusion in analytic technique stems from a reduction of psychoanalysis to a two-body (intersubjective) psychology, and proposes that the analytic experience must instead be formulated as a three-term relation in which speech is the central organizing element.
The imaginary inter-reaction between analysand and analyst is thus something we shall have to take into consideration.
-
#31
Seminar I · Freud's Papers on Technique · Jacques Lacan · p.127
**X**
Theoretical move: Lacan uses ethological evidence (Lorenz/Tinbergen's releasing mechanisms) to argue that the libidinal drive is structurally centred on the imaginary—on image rather than real partner—thereby grounding the distinction between ego-drives and sexual drives in the Imaginary register, and reframing Freud's two narcissisms as two distinct relations to the image.
In the functioning of pairing mechanisms, ethologists have proved the dominance of the image, which appears in the guise of a transitory phenotype... a Gestalt, which sets the reproductive behaviour in motion.
-
#32
Seminar XI · The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan
WHAT IS A PICTURE? > OF THE GAZE
Theoretical move: Lacan distinguishes *invidia* (envy as gaze) from jealousy by showing that envy is not oriented toward want but toward a fantasized completeness in the Other — it is the subject's confrontation with the *objet petit a* as a satisfaction belonging to another, which grounds the "taming and fascinating power" of the picture and anticipates the theory of transference.
the envy that makes the subject pale before the image of a completeness closed upon itself
-
#33
Seminar XII · Crucial Problems for Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.177
**Presentation by Monsieur Valabrega**
Theoretical move: This passage is a multi-voice clinical-theoretical discussion of Leclaire's case presentation, turning on the distinction between fantasy and signifier, the differential status of first name versus family name for subjectivity/singularity, the question of the empty unconscious, the body's encounter with the signifier, and the role of transference and the Name-of-the-Father in an obsessional patient's structure.
they take it into account above all at the imaginary level which does not already exclude, obviously, the presence of the symbolic.
-
#34
Seminar XIII · The Object of Psychoanalysis (alt. translation) · Jacques Lacan · p.67
**Seminar 5: Wednesday 5 January 1966**
Theoretical move: Lacan uses topological figures—the torus, the cross-cap, and the Möbius strip—to argue that the subject is constitutively divided (not primordially unified), and that the Objet petit a as "truth-value" is the irreducible object that makes possible the world of objects and the subject's relation to it; the disc produced by cutting the cross-cap stands in a position of necessary crossing with the Möbius strip, which in turn figures the divided subject.
the mirage that is constituted by this something which has remained on the seat of the trousers of psychoanalysis as a remainder of the old theory of knowledge and nothing else, the idea of autoerotic fusion, of the supposed primordial unity of the thinking being
-
#35
Seminar XIII · The Object of Psychoanalysis (alt. translation) · Jacques Lacan · p.287
Monsieur Safouan
Theoretical move: Safouan's case presentation of an obsessional's 'duplication of the feminine object' is used to argue that the split between a narcissistic/desired beloved and an anaclitic/demanding 'perverse' partner is structurally grounded in the imaginary phallus (-phi): the beloved is not identified to the phallus but to minus-phi, the guarantee of the Other's castration, while the subject himself is subtilised into (-phi), such that symbolic castration (as the regularisation of the phallic position) must be distinguished from imaginary castration via yet-unformulated distinctions around negation.
the imaginary phallus, which is henceforth to function as (-phi), and it is from this angle the one can say that the phallic position ensures that the subject is, not neither man nor woman, but one or the other.
-
#36
Seminar XIII · The Object of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.234
**Seminar 19: Wednesday 25 May 1966**
Theoretical move: Lacan uses Velázquez's *Las Meninas* as a visual matheme for the structural relationship between the gaze, the mirror, the Objet petit a, the Ideal Ego, and the field of the big Other: the painting is not a representation but a "trap for the look," and the royal couple's invisible gaze from the mirror-position enacts the function of the big Other in the narcissistic/specular relationship, while the o-object (objet petit a) remains irreducibly non-specular and therefore haunts the schema from outside it.
bad painters never do anything but their own portrait... Velasquez, even when he introduces himself into the picture in a self-portrait, does not paint himself in a mirror
-
#37
Seminar XIII · The Object of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.49
IV - IDENTITY AND NON-IDENTITYTO ONESELF: THE DEATH DRIVE
Theoretical move: Lacan critically engages Stein's account of narcissistic regression in the analytic situation, using it as a foil to distinguish the imaginary dual relation from the big Other and to locate the o-object (objet petit a) within the structure of desire rather than as a supplement to fusional narcissism—thereby insisting that the analytic situation has an articulated symbolic structure, not merely a fusional lack of distinction.
it is the category of the imaginary other which seemed to me to appear most often highlighted to the point that his work seemed to me to tend at different moments to present the analytic situation as a dual situation
-
#38
Seminar XVI · From an Other to the other · Jacques Lacan · p.264
Seminar 15: Wednesday 19 March 1969 > **Seminar 17: Wednesday 23 April 1969**
Theoretical move: Lacan stages a confrontation between Hegel's Selbstbewusstsein and the Freudian unconscious to argue that thinking is constitutively a censorship of an originary "I do not know," and that desire (to know) is born from this nodal failure of knowledge — a topology illustrated via the Klein bottle and Möbius strip, and clinically anchored in free association and the objet petit a.
Set theory precisely is constructed to strip this numerical ordering - and this is what I call of ideal or imaginary privileges - of the unit.
-
#39
Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.155
Seminar 9: Wednesday 18 March 1970
Theoretical move: Lacan establishes the Real Father as a structural-logical operator defined by impossibility: as the agent (not the performer) of castration, the Real Father is constitutively an effect of language, not a psychological or empirical figure, and the impossibility he embodies is precisely what generates the master signifier through the repetitive failure of demand, producing surplus-jouissance as loss.
It is a necessary, structural dependency of something that precisely escapes us, namely, the Real Father. And defining the Real Father in a sure way is strictly ruled out... It is not at all surprising that we ceaselessly encounter the imaginary father.
-
#40
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.269
XVIII > Introduction of the big Other > Sosiel
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the symbolic order of marriage is constitutively androcentric (drawing on Lévi-Strauss), positioning the woman as an object of exchange rather than a subject, which generates an irreducible structural conflict between the symbolic pact (fidelity directed toward the universal) and the imaginary vicissitudes of libidinal relations; the myth of Amphitryon reveals that only a triangular structure involving a transcendent "god" (Name of the Father) can sustain the conjugal bond above imaginary degradation.
there is a conflict between this symbolic pact and the imaginary relations which proliferate spontaneously within every libidinal relation
-
#41
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.322
XXIII > A, m, a, S > VERBUM AND DABAR THE MACHINE AND INTUITION SCHEMA OF THE CURE
Theoretical move: Lacan deploys the contrast between the cybernetic machine's point-by-point scanning and the human faculty of Gestalt recognition to demarcate the Imaginary order (intuitive, good-form perception) from the Symbolic order (axiomatic, formulaic, artificial composition), arguing that the machine's inability to produce simplicity from good forms is itself empirical evidence of this structural opposition.
Everything intuitive is far closer to the imaginary than to the symbolic.
-
#42
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.123
THE FR EUDIAN SCHEMATA OF TH E P S YCHIC APP ARATUS > IX
Theoretical move: Lacan traces the internal logic of Freud's *Project* schema, showing how the attempt to eliminate consciousness (by grounding the psychic apparatus in homeostasis, facilitation, and hallucination as primary process) necessarily reinstates consciousness-perception as an autonomous corrective system for reality-testing—and that this tension, rather than marking a conversion to psychology, is the continuous unfolding of a single metaphysics that will only be resolved by introducing information and the imaginary.
the imaginary function of the ego comes into play. Man gets to see this reflection from the point of view of the other.
-
#43
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.281
XVIII > Introduction of the big Other > Sosiel
Theoretical move: Lacan uses the myth of Amphitryon (Sosie/double) and a critique of Fairbairn's clinical case to argue that analysis progresses not through ego-splitting observation but through speech addressed to the absolute Other, and that misrecognition of the imaginary register—treating imaginary drives as real—produces iatrogenic paranoia rather than cure.
by failing to recognise [meconnaitre] the imaginary register, we bring the subject to recognise his partial drives in the real.
-
#44
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.312
XXIII > Psychoanalysis and cybernetics, or on the -nature of language > LECTURE <sup>I</sup>
Theoretical move: By contrasting the symbolic with the imaginary through a cybernetic lens, Lacan argues that the symbolic order has an irreducible autonomy—it governs human beings from the outside, constitutes their non-mastery over language, and grounds the Freudian insistence of the repressed as the relation of non-being to being.
Is this imaginary homogeneous with the symbolic? No. And it would be a perversion of the meaning of psychoanalysis to reduce it to an emphasis on these imaginary themes, to the coaptation of the subject by an elective, privileged, prevailing object.
-
#45
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.265
XVIII > Introduction of the big Other > Objectified analysis
Theoretical move: Lacan critiques Object Relations theory (Fairbairn) for collapsing the imaginary and the real, and for reducing analytic action to an ego-normative dual relation; he argues instead that the imaginary only becomes analytically operative when transcribed into the symbolic order, where the subject's account of itself in speech constitutes the true lever of analysis.
The symbolic relation is constituted as early as possible, even prior to the fixation of the self image of the subject, prior to the structuring image of the ego
-
#46
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.325
XXIII > A, m, a, S > Without a doubt.
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the Symbolic order is irreducible to human (imaginary) experience: ternarity is intrinsic to the machine's symbolic structure, the triangle belongs to the imaginary insofar as it is a form, yet is reducible to symbolic relations; and while imaginary 'ballast' is necessary for concrete human language, it also obstructs the subject's full realization in the Symbolic. The closing turn to Freud's Beyond the Pleasure Principle frames symptom-resolution as a matter of restoring symbolic signification.
It is precisely through that that it may be an obstacle to the progress of the realisation of the subject in the symbolic order... we always think by means of some imaginary gobetween, which halts, stops, clouds up the symbolic mediation.
-
#47
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.61
II > A materialist definition of the phenomenon of consciousness
Theoretical move: The Mirror Stage dialectic is radicalized through the automaton/machine model to show that the ego is constitutively imaginary and parasitic on an alien unity; only the intervention of the Symbolic Order — a 'third party' located in the unconscious — can break the impasse of dual imaginary rivalry and transform mere knowledge (connaissance) into recognition (reconnaissance).
Subjectivity on the level of the ego is comparable to this couple … The subjective half of the premirror experience is the paralytic, who cannot move about by himself except in an uncoordinated and clumsy way. What masters him is the image of the ego, which is blind, and which carries him.
-
#48
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.276
XVIII > Introduction of the big Other > Sosiel
Theoretical move: Using the Amphitryon/Sosie myth as a clinical allegory, Lacan argues that the ego is constitutively alienated—always encountering its own reflected image rather than attaining desire or the Other—and that this imaginary capture is at its most binding in obsessional neurosis, where ego-reinforcement (as prescribed by ego psychology) only deepens the subject's dispossession.
to become aware of the essentially imaginary character of what is said in that place when the absolute transcendent Other is invoked, this Other to be found in language each time speech endeavours to be uttered.
-
#49
Seminar II · The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.258
XVIII > Introduction of the big Other > Objectified analysis
Theoretical move: Lacan critiques Fairbairn's object-relations reformulation of analysis as exemplary of a deeper theoretical error: the confusion of the real, imaginary, and symbolic registers under the single undifferentiated term 'object', which transforms analysis into an ego-remodelling exercise grounded in the specular/imaginary relation rather than the symbolic register of speech.
his imagery, has some connection with what we cover by the term 'imaginary economy'. You will also see clearly the great risks which analysis runs by sticking to the level of such a conceptualisation.
-
#50
Seminar XX · Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge · Jacques Lacan · p.188
**Seminar 9: Wednesday 20 March 1973**
Theoretical move: Lacan links the objet petit a as a semblance of being to a primordial scene of jealous enjoyment (jalouissance) drawn from Augustine, positioning it as the first substitutive enjoyment that founds desire through metonymy and demand addressed to the Other, and closes on the question of whether having the object a is the same as being it — a question he refers to "The Meaning of the Phallus."
from what 'imageaillisse from the look
-
#51
Seminar XXII · R.S.I. · Jacques Lacan · p.85
**Introduction** > **Seminar 5: Tuesday 11 February 1975**
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the Borromean knotting of the Symbolic, Imaginary, and Real requires a fourth supplementary element—the Name-of-the-Father (functioning as a fourth torus)—to hold the three registers together, while simultaneously opening the question of whether this paternal supplement is strictly indispensable or merely historically contingent in Freud and in current analytic practice.
It surely constitutes a progress in the Imaginary, namely, a progress in consistency.
-
#52
Seminar XXII · R.S.I. · Jacques Lacan · p.89
**Introduction** > **Seminar 6: Tuesday 18 February 1975**
Theoretical move: Lacan advances the Borromean knot as the primary topological operator of his theory, arguing that its three constitutive dimensions—consistency, hole, and ek-sistence—correspond respectively to the Imaginary, Real, and Symbolic; the passage works through errors in flattening the knot to demonstrate that mathematical/geometric intuition is rooted in the cord (material consistency) and that the straight line as infinity is itself a ring, implicating the knot structure throughout.
an extension that can be drawn. For this indeed is the way that it will not be displaced, in which it will not be inopportune to define this surface whose geometry I showed earlier, the one that is imagined, that is essentially sustained by an Imaginary.
-
#53
Seminar XXII · R.S.I. · Jacques Lacan · p.8
**Introduction** > **Seminar 1: Tuesday 10 December 1974**
Theoretical move: Lacan opens Seminar XXII by arguing that the Real, Symbolic, and Imaginary only acquire a "common measure" — i.e., can be said to be genuinely three — through the Borromean knot, which provides the minimal topological structure (requiring three as its minimum) that holds them together; this displaces Freud's spatial-geometrical (sack) topology in favour of a knot-based topology, and identifies the Imaginary as grounded in the body, the Symbolic in equivocation/writing, and the Real as strictly unthinkable.
when you bring the Imaginary into play, you have every chance of becoming entangled. This is even how people started out for the infinitesimal: people had all sorts of trouble getting out of the Imaginary.
-
#54
Seminar XXII · R.S.I. · Jacques Lacan · p.134
**Introduction** > **Seminar 9: Tuesday 8 April 1975**
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the Imaginary is structurally "stuck" in the sphere-and-cross figure (a pre-topological image of the body), and that the Borromean knot represents the proper topological instrument for escaping this captivity — linking the knot's discovery to the analytic discourse as a new social bond and to the Freudian "hole" in the universe, while insisting that truth can only be half-said.
It is hard to imagine the degree to which the Imaginary is sticky and has a stickiness that I am right away going to designate, that of the sphere and of the cross.
-
#55
Seminar XXIII · The Sinthome · Jacques Lacan · p.43
**Seminar 3: Wednesday! 6 December 1975**
Theoretical move: Lacan deploys the Borromean knot topology to distribute the three registers (Real, Symbolic, Imaginary) as structurally equivalent yet functionally differentiated supports—assigning consistency to the Imaginary, the hole to the Symbolic, and ex-sistence to the Real—and argues that a fourth term (the sinthome) is always required to prop up the subject, which the minimum Borromean chain of four demonstrates.
the Imaginary is deployed in the style of two circles... joined to the Imaginary of the body, something like a specific inhibition which would be characterised especially by the uncanny
-
#56
Seminar III · The Psychoses · Jacques Lacan · p.160
**X** > **XI** > **1**
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that psychosis cannot be adequately explained at the level of the imaginary (projection, narcissism, ideal ego) because alienation is constitutive of the imaginary as such; what distinguishes psychosis is a breakdown at the level of the symbolic order, specifically through Verwerfung (foreclosure), which operates in the field of symbolic articulation that subtends the reality principle — a field Lacan grounds in the primordial symbolic nihilation of reality itself.
the Kleinian substructure of the imaginary, namely, the oral complex… can only be an incorporation of the analyst's discourse. On this deviant conception analysis can't be anything other than the incorporation of the suggested, even supposed, discourse of the analyst.
-
#57
Seminar III · The Psychoses · Jacques Lacan · p.174
**XII** > **The hysteric's question**
Theoretical move: By analyzing Schreber's delusion through the schema of analytic communication, Lacan argues that in psychosis the big Other—where being is realized through speech—is foreclosed, reducing discourse to an internal echo (automatism) that cannot resolve the subject's constitution; this structural difference from neurosis must be clarified before any technique for working with psychotics can be formulated.
the progressive migration of the subject's image towards the S, the thing to be revealed, the thing that has no name... the economy of the imaginary relation has been progressively pared down.
-
#58
Seminar III · The Psychoses · Jacques Lacan · p.118
**VIII**
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the fundamental distinction between neurosis and psychosis lies in the register where the repressed returns: in neurosis it returns *in loco* within the symbolic order (under a mask), while in psychosis it returns *in altero* in the imaginary (without a mask) — and that post-Freudian ego-psychology's reduction of psychosis to ego-defense mechanisms systematically obscures this economic and topographical distinction.
Freud realized that there are modifications to the imaginary structure of the world and that they interfere with modifications to the symbolic structure.
-
#59
Seminar IV · The Object Relation · Jacques Lacan · p.200
ON THE OEDIPUS COMPLEX
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the Oedipus complex cannot be resolved on the imaginary plane alone (where it produces only anxiety and symptom), but requires the introduction of a real element into the symbolic order — the paternal figure who "truly has" the phallus — such that castration becomes the necessary condition for the male subject's accession to the virile position and the inscription of the Law; yet the symbolic father as such can never be fully incarnated by any real individual.
On the imaginary plane, however, nothing enables us to envisage the jump that makes the child shift away from the luring game with his mother.
-
#60
Seminar IV · The Object Relation · Jacques Lacan · p.214
ON THE OEDIPUS COMPLEX > ON THE CASTRATION COMPLEX
Theoretical move: Lacan distinguishes the imaginary, real, and symbolic registers of the father to argue that it is specifically the real father—not the imaginary one—who bears the decisive function in the castration complex, and that the child's fundamental position in relation to the mother is structured by the phallus as the object of maternal desire, establishing the ground from which the Oedipal drama must be understood.
The imaginary father also participates, ipso facto, with typical characteristics... linked solely to this period, and to the function that this imaginary father will hold at this stage of development.
-
#61
Seminar IV · The Object Relation · Jacques Lacan · p.123
Jacques Lacan The Object Relation > THE PERVERSE WAYS OF DESIRE > A CHILD IS BEING BEATEN AND THE YOUNG HOMOSEXUAL WOMAN
Theoretical move: Lacan uses the case of the young homosexual woman to demonstrate how perversion arises from a structural permutation within the Imaginary-Symbolic-Real triad: when the symbolic father intrudes into the imaginary plane as a real event (giving a child to the mother), the subject identifies with the paternal function and reorganises her desire around what the love-object lacks (the symbolic phallus), revealing that love is essentially a gift of what one does not have.
This is not simply something that polarises the kindling of desire... in such fashion as to be observable in children's behaviour where these images are referenced to the fundamental image that gives the subject his comprehensive status.
-
#62
Seminar IV · The Object Relation · Jacques Lacan · p.234
ON THE OEDIPUS COMPLEX > THE SIGNIFIER IN THE REAL
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the Symbolic order — demonstrated through the internal lawfulness of a combinatorial letter-sequence and the lion/counting anecdote — introduces an originary dimension into the Real that is irreducible to experience, and then deploys this argument to read the pre-phobic structure of little Hans's imaginary phallus as the condition of possibility for the eruption of castration anxiety.
Hans is showing on the imaginary plane the most formally typical attitudes one may expect from what in our harsh language we call virile aggression.
-
#63
Seminar IV · The Object Relation · Jacques Lacan · p.253
WHAT MYTH IS FOR
Theoretical move: The passage argues that Hans's phobia arises at the precise moment when the child is required to make the transition from treating the phallus as an imaginary element in the mother's desire to recognising its symbolic value within the signifying system — a passage that is structurally insurmountable without the paternal intervention that introduces a minimum ternary (or quaternary) organisation of the symbolic order.
this intimacy, this connivance of the imaginary game with his mother
-
#64
Seminar IV · The Object Relation · Jacques Lacan · p.264
HOW MYTH IS ANALYSED
Theoretical move: Lacan advances the argument that the child's passage through the Oedipus complex requires moving from an imaginary dialectic of veiling/unveiling around the phallic object (as the mother's imaginary phallus) to the symbolic register of castration in relation to the father, and that little Hans's phobia enacts this transition mythically. The scopic drive is shown to be structurally distinct from the purely imaginary dual relation, grounding the analysis of perversion and the misrecognition of female castration.
we remain in total ambiguity regarding what might be called Hans's belief... everything begins with the game between Hans and his mother seeing, not seeing, being on the lookout for where this phallus is
-
#65
Seminar V · Formations of the Unconscious · Jacques Lacan · p.491
**EXPLANATION OF THESCHEMAS** > 2 This year's schema
Theoretical move: The passage explicates the Graph of Desire schema by showing how the retroactive action of the signifying chain on the signified produces meaning, and how desire serves as the middle term that inserts discourse into the speaking subject, distinguishing the human level (with desire and the Other) from the animal level (specular imaginary confrontation).
The specular imaginary confrontation a - a' is located at this level.
-
#66
Seminar VI · Desire and Its Interpretation · Jacques Lacan · p.229
THE LAUGHTER OF THE IMMORTAL GODS
Theoretical move: Lacan formalizes the quadripartite structure of subject-formation by showing that the specular couple [a-a'] is always already regulated by the more primitive dyad of the unconstituted subject and the mother-as-One, and that the birth of metaphor (substitution) is the moment at which the object is symbolized and desire properly emerges — yielding the formula of fantasy ($◇a) inscribed within a four-term schema.
the mother's body, insofar as the latter is, in effect, the imaginary object of primal identification
-
#67
Seminar VI · Desire and Its Interpretation · Jacques Lacan · p.120
INTRODUCING THE OBJECT OF DESIRE
Theoretical move: The passage traces the movement from the animal's excremental territoriality through language's complication of the subject/object relation (use→exchange value), to the dialectic of desire: identification with the father fails to resolve desire's impasse, so the most general "solution" offered to the barred subject is narcissism, which structures fantasy by transferring the subject's anxiety onto object a, yielding the formula of the ego-ideal as i(a)/$ ◇ a/I.
identification with the father ideal, which denies the reality of the subject's relationship with his father
-
#68
Seminar VI · Desire and Its Interpretation · Jacques Lacan · p.128
DESIRE'S PHALLIC MEDIATION
Theoretical move: Desire cannot be reduced to demand or frustration but must be grasped through the tight knot of Real, Imaginary, and Symbolic; the dream of the dead father exemplifies how the imaginary interposition of the father's image props up desire as a shield against the anxiety of subjective elision, with the fantasy formula (S◇a) expressing the structural absence of the subject that is constitutive of desire itself.
He does not cite just any old prop for his desire, just any old desire, but the closest and most urgent one, the best one, the desire that had long dominated him, the one he had subdued but that he must now bring back to life imaginarily for a while.
-
#69
Seminar VI · Desire and Its Interpretation · Jacques Lacan · p.201
THE IMAGE OF THE INSIDE-OUT GLOVE > I am going to skip here a little,
Theoretical move: Lacan uses a clinical case analysis to argue that the patient's fundamental fantasy is structured around an "inside-out glove" image — a masturbatory, non-separating envelopment of male and female elements — and that the analyst's (Sharpe's) interpretive errors stem from reducing a complex signifying fantasy to a dyadic, imaginary transference and crude screen-memory reconstruction, thereby missing the structural topology of the subject's desire.
What is involved here is both the imaginary and the signifying character in the dream who is the central image with which the subject in some sense sees that any and all possible expression of his sexuality is enveloped or caught up.
-
#70
Seminar VIII · Transference · Jacques Lacan · p.105
**M EDICAL H A R M O N Y** > *ARISTOPHANES*
Theoretical move: Lacan uses Aristophanes' myth of the spherical beings in the Symposium to argue that what is being satirized is not mere comedy but the philosophical figure of the *sphairos* — the self-sufficient, self-identical sphere central to ancient cosmology (Empedocles, Plato's Timaeus) — thereby revealing that Plato stages a comic deflation of his own cosmological imaginary through Aristophanes' discourse on love. This move prepares a critique of unification as the model of love (contra Freud's Eros/Thanatos opposition) and links the Imaginary register to the fascination with spherical wholeness.
His universe was entirely regulated by the properties of the sphere, defined as the shape that bears within itself the virtues of selfsufficiency... They are, moreover, refined, because he stupefies us by bringing in the five perfect solids that can be inscribed within a sphere
-
#71
The Triumph of Religion · Jacques Lacan · p.95
Translator's Notes
Theoretical move: This passage is a translator's notes section providing bibliographic references, terminological clarifications, and contextual annotations for Lacan's "Triumph of Religion" text; it contains no original theoretical argumentation.
in Lacan's work semblable evokes rivalry and jealousy first and foremost... the mirroring of two imaginary others (a and a') who resemble each other
-
#72
How (Not) to Speak of God · Peter Rollins
HOW (NOT) TO SPEAK OF GOD > Part 1 > *Inhabiting the God-shaped hole* > *Being evangelized*
Theoretical move: The passage argues that genuine theological dialogue requires a posture of receptive powerlessness rather than monological self-assertion, reframing Christian mission as a mutual transformation in which the missionary is evangelized by the Other rather than simply transmitting God to the unreached.
a standard monologue of those who would wish to either clone the other, making them into a reflection of themselves
-
#73
The Singularity of Being: Lacan and the Immortal Within · Mari Ruti · p.155
6. *The Dignity of the Thing* > *Repetition as Creativity* > *Symbolic Ideals and Values*
Theoretical move: The passage argues that symbolic quilting points, when chosen critically, serve a constructive function by anchoring desire in collective meaning without arresting its movement—thus enabling sublimation rather than narcissistic closure—and that the ego ideal (symbolic) is theoretically superior to the ideal ego (imaginary) precisely because it opens onto collective structures rather than foreclosing personal limitation.
they rescue us from the narcissistic economy of the imaginary, allowing us to exchange the ideal ego of the mirror stage for the (ego) ideals of the symbolic.
-
#74
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.153
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 3 </span><span id="ch3.xhtml_p133" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 133. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>The Freudian Dialectic > Aggressivity and the Death Drive
Theoretical move: Boothby argues that Lacan's reinterpretation displaces the death drive from biology onto the imaginary register: the death drive is the disintegrating pressure of the Real against imaginary binding, making psychical life a ceaseless dialectic of formation and deformation that grounds both aggressivity and desire in the alienating structure of the ego.
The metabolism of the psychical apparatus becomes identifiable with a ceaseless cycle of formation and deformation. Unities are continually crystallized by the action of imaginary fusion, broken apart by the effects of the death drive, and congealed once again in new forms.
-
#75
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.85
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 2 </span><span id="ch2.xhtml_p71" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 71. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>Between the Image and the Word > The Unconscious Play of the Signifier
Theoretical move: Repression operates at the unstable fault line between the Symbolic and the Imaginary: an imaginary fixation (intensive investment in an image/figure) truncates the symbolic chain, yet the symbolic network persists beneath repression, explaining both the return of the repressed and the subject's inability to voluntarily undo repression through conscious effort alone.
As long as Freud's consciousness is dominated by the imaginary presentation (the thing-presentation), the linguistic equivalent (the word-presentation) will not appear.
-
#76
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 2 </span><span id="ch2.xhtml_p71" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 71. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>Between the Image and the Word > <span id="ch2.xhtml_p86" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 86. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>From Image to Sign
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the signifier operates at the unstable juncture between the Imaginary and the Symbolic: its gestalt must appear perceptually yet immediately self-evacuate, and repression itself can be theorized as a transposition from symbolic to imaginary register—the signifier's body becoming an opaque image rather than a transparent vehicle of meaning.
it was the very body of the signifier itself that was turned into an image... the mechanism of repression... turns upon a transposition from a symbolic to an imaginary register.
-
#77
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.172
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 3 </span><span id="ch3.xhtml_p133" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 133. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>The Freudian Dialectic > Language Acquisition and the Oedipus Complex
Theoretical move: Boothby argues that the Oedipal transformation is best understood structurally as a labor of the death drive that deconstructs imaginary identification and installs the child in the symbolic order, linking castration anxiety, superego formation, and jouissance into a coherent Lacanian re-reading of Freudian metapsychology.
the imaginary ego is confronted with a revived specter of the corps morcelé
-
#78
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.90
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 2 </span><span id="ch2.xhtml_p71" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 71. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>Between the Image and the Word > <span id="ch2.xhtml_p86" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 86. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>From Image to Sign
Theoretical move: By mapping Freud's distinction between focal and diffuse cathexis onto Lacan's Imaginary/Symbolic opposition, Boothby argues that every act of symbolic signification necessarily passes through an imaginary moment—a perceptual gestalt registration—revealing that the Imaginary is not external to but constitutively embedded within the Symbolic.
the necessarily imaginary moment at the heart of linguistic signification
-
#79
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 2 </span><span id="ch2.xhtml_p71" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 71. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>Between the Image and the Word > <span id="ch2.xhtml_p72" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 72. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>In the Shadow of the Image
Theoretical move: Boothby argues that Freudian cathexis/anticathexis can be re-read through Gestalt figure-ground dynamics, and that this perceptual automatism is ultimately grounded in Lacan's Imaginary order — whose constitutive power to unify perceptual objects is inseparable from an effect of méconnaissance.
It is the imaginary function that grounds the relative stability of perceived objects, lending to them their 'attributes of permanence, identity, and substantiality'
-
#80
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.162
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 3 </span><span id="ch3.xhtml_p133" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 133. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>The Freudian Dialectic > The Agency of Death in the Signifier
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the death drive is double-sided: operating as imaginary unbinding (violence, hallucination, fragmentation) and as symbolic unbinding (signification), where the symbolic constitutes a "second-order binding" whose very bound structure enables ongoing dissolution of imaginary unities — thereby translating Freud's instinct-fusion into a dialectic of binding/unbinding immanent to the speech chain itself.
Binding on the level of the imaginary involves a fixation of the positing function... the adumbration of a perceptual form that is rendered distinct from a background
-
#81
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.83
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 2 </span><span id="ch2.xhtml_p71" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 71. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>Between the Image and the Word > The Unconscious Play of the Signifier
Theoretical move: By mapping Freud's thing-presentation/word-presentation distinction onto Lacan's Imaginary/Symbolic axes via the Schema L, Boothby argues that repression is not a topographic displacement but a dynamic shift of valence between two psychical functions—a structural transformation in which a signifying process becomes captured in an imaginary formation, rendering the unconscious a process rather than a receptacle.
whatever interrupts it... the imaginary function of the ego, as such, is,—it is up to it whether the passage or non-passage occurs
-
#82
Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology After Lacan · Richard Boothby · p.136
<span class="chnum ordinal">Chapter 3 </span><span id="ch3.xhtml_p133" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 133. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>The Freudian Dialectic > <span id="ch3.xhtml_p134" class="pagebreak" aria-label=" page 134. " role="doc-pagebreak"></span>The Formative Power of the Image
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the Lacanian Imaginary—centered on the unifying power of the mirror-stage gestalt—is the indispensable complement to the Symbolic, and that it is precisely this imaginary function (the organism's detachment from instinct via perceptual form) that explains the constancy, variability, and "perverse" character of the human drive as distinct from animal instinct.
the functioning of the imaginary in the human being is therefore said by Lacan to be akin to the most general structure of human knowledge; that which constitutes the ego and its objects with attributes of permanance, identity, and substantiality
-
#83
The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.310
A Play of Props > **A Sociology of Associations**
Theoretical move: The passage argues that actor-network theory dissolves the modern self/society dichotomy by reconceiving individuality as assembled from 'extra-psychic' associations rather than atomic interiority, and then positions the conceptual history of chatter/idle talk/empty speech (from Kierkegaard through Heidegger to Lacan) as a pre-history of the communicative 'modes of circulation' that actor-network theory needs but has not yet theorized.
in the machinations of empty speech, Lacan found evidence of the Freudian crowd— an imaginary order comprised of hyper-rationalized (and for this reason profoundly neurotic) attachments between specular images, egos, ego-ideals, ideal egos, superegos, and the like.
-
#84
Beyond the Pleasure Principle and Other Writings (alt. ed.) · Sigmund Freud
Introduction
Theoretical move: The passage uses Falstaff and Rosalind as exemplary figures of a psychoanalytically-inflected imagination that resists both the regressive superego (Falstaff's demystification of paternal authority) and the oceanic id (Rosalind's complication of erotic reduction), arguing that Shakespearean imagination offers an alternative to Freud's resigned acceptance of civilizational constraint.
this inspired breaking and remaking of the paternal imago
-
#85
Sex and the Failed Absolute · Slavoj Žižek · p.124
**Sex and the Failed Absolute** > Sex as Our Brush with the Absolute > [Sexual Parallax and Knowledge](#contents.xhtml_ahd8)
Theoretical move: The passage enacts the Hegelian move from epistemological deadlock to ontological impossibility, arguing that the subject's constitutive failure to symbolize itself, the Other's opacity to itself, and sexuality's irreducible excess all converge on the same structure: reality is non-all, and the obstacle to knowledge IS the thing-in-itself. The enigma OF the other must become the enigma IN the other, grounding universality not in shared content but in shared failure.
the imaginary other—my *semblant*, my fellow-man who is simultaneously like me and my competitor, the one with whom I am caught in the struggle for recognition
-
#86
Subject Lessons: Hegel, Lacan, and the Future of Materialism · Russell Sbriglia & Slavoj Žižek (eds.) · p.139
Adrian Johnston > Žižek continues:
Theoretical move: Johnston defends his "transcendental materialist" position against charges of both naturalistic reductionism and idealist anti-reductionism by confessing to a "weak reductionism" that preserves relative autonomy for philosophy/psychoanalysis with respect to the natural sciences, while arguing through Hegel, Marx, and Lacan that the natural Real is partially but not absolutely transformed by the non-natural Symbolic—a position distinct from both crude naturalism and absolute anti-naturalism.
the distinctively 'human' (as spiritual als geistige, subjective, minded/like-minded, socio-historical, Symbolic, etc.)
-
#87
The Impossible David Lynch · Todd McGowan · p.69
,'\ru'/,¡/ ¡)(" ,.: '\';11." \,,'" .1, ,,( T H E *impossible* /h,-Ft'llItllc *Form* LUCr FI~CH~k **DAVID LYN CH** > **Not Enough Fontosy**
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the failure to fully commit to fantasy — epitomised by Sailor's investment in symbolic/phallic authority and Lula's investment in imaginary authority — is not a warning against fantasy but a demonstration of what is lost when subjects orient themselves toward the Other's recognition rather than following the logic of fantasy to its gap-exposing conclusion.
where Sailor invests himself in symbolic authority at the expense of fantasy, Lula invests herself in an imaginary authority — her mother Marietta.
-
#88
The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance · Bruce Fink · p.104
<span id="page-101-0"></span>Object (a): Cause of Desire > *Imaginary Objects, Imaginary Relations*
Theoretical move: The passage traces Lacan's early theorisation of the ego as imaginary object (*a*), showing how imaginary relations (love/identification and hate/rivalry) operate through the logic of same/different, and contrasts this with the later emergence of the real object cause of desire (objet petit a), while situating countertransference as an inescapably imaginary phenomenon that the analyst must set aside.
'Imaginary relations' are not illusory relationships-relationships that don't *really* exist-but rather relations between egos, wherein everything is played out in terms of but one opposition: same or different.
-
#89
The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance · Bruce Fink · p.56
<span id="page-53-0"></span>**The Lacanian Subject** > **The Lacanian Subject Is Not the "Individual" or Conscious Subject of Anglo-American Philosophy**
Theoretical move: The passage distinguishes the Lacanian subject from both the ego (as theorized in ego psychology) and the conscious subject of analytic philosophy, arguing that the ego is a narcissistic construct of crystallized ideal images whose very nature is distortion and error — making it precisely what the Lacanian subject is NOT.
Such images are invested, cathected, and internalized by a child because his or her parents make a great deal of them
-
#90
The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance · Bruce Fink · p.234
<span id="page-231-0"></span>**Index**
Theoretical move: This is the index of Bruce Fink's *The Lacanian Subject*, listing key concepts, proper names, and page references — a non-substantive navigational apparatus with no original theoretical argumentation.
Imaginary register: difference and, 189n.5: mirror stage, 51, 162, 189n.5: relations in, 84; sexual identity, 116-17
-
#91
The Odd One In: On Comedy (alt. ed.) · Alenka Zupančič · p.91
Physics of the Infinite against Metaphysics of the Finite > And a little further on:
Theoretical move: Comedy's proper theoretical object is not simply the deconstruction of imaginary unity into multiplicity, but the "impossible" short-circuit between two constitutively exclusive sides of reality — the moment when the split subject cannot fully separate from its other, and when words (the Symbolic) produce material effects of truth that exceed and yet cannot be reduced to sense-certainty.
This flagrant nonimportance of the likeness between the two Sosies is also part of another comic procedure that consists in flagrantly ignoring not only resemblance, but everything that immediate sensory perception is telling us.
-
#92
The Parallax View · Slavoj Žižek · p.243
Copernicus, Darwin, Freud . . . and Many Others > From Physics to Design?
Theoretical move: Žižek uses Dennett's dual-ontology (physics/design) and intentional-stance framework as a foil to argue that consciousness is constitutively negative—its power lies in abstraction, delay, and the ability to veto—thereby mobilising Hegel's infinite negative power of Understanding against eliminativist and adaptationist accounts of mind, while exposing the covert teleology (quasi-Kantian regulative idea, fetishistic disavowal) lurking in Darwinian naturalism.
the Cartesian Theater, the imaginary place in the center of the brain 'where it all comes together' for consciousness. There is no such place.
-
#93
The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan · Todd McGowan · p.223
29
Theoretical move: Fantasy's function is to transform the impossible objet petit a into an apparently accessible object of desire by installing a symbolic barrier; but when that barrier is removed and the subject directly accesses the object, the fantasmatic world collapses, revealing the object as pure nothingness—a structural impossibility that the cinema of intersection makes directly visible through the gaze.
Though fantasy constructs a world of fullness and presence, it cannot transform an object of desire into a present object without at the same time destroying its desirability.
-
#94
The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan · Todd McGowan · p.17
**Introduction: From the Imaginary Look to the Real Gaze** > **The Emergence of Lacanian Film Theory**
Theoretical move: The passage argues that early Lacanian film theory erred not by over-relying on psychoanalytic concepts but by deviating from them—specifically by reducing the Lacanian gaze to an imaginary function of spectatorial mastery derived from the mirror stage, while neglecting the symbolic and real orders; the proper response is a return to Lacan's own concepts, especially the Real gaze, as the basis for a genuine renewal of psychoanalytic film theory.
any psychoanalytic reflection on the cinema might be defined in Lacanian terms as an attempt to disengage the cinema-object from the imaginary and to win it for the symbolic
-
#95
The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan · Todd McGowan · p.225
29 > **Preface** > **Introduction**
Theoretical move: This endnotes passage consolidates the theoretical apparatus of the book by anchoring its key moves—the Lacanian gaze as object rather than look, the critique of empiricism in spectator theory, the real as the neglected register in film theory, and masochism as the primary form of cinematic enjoyment—through a dense network of citations and polemical asides.
Christian Metz, The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and Cinema
-
#96
Theory Keywords · Various · p.39
**Fantasy** > **Imaginary Order**
Theoretical move: The Imaginary Order is theorized as a pre-linguistic realm of ego-formation, mirror-identification, and illusory unity whose constitutive lack is ontological rather than developmental, and whose concealment of the Symbolic and Real makes its exposure a political as well as psychoanalytic task.
The imaginary is the realm of the ego, a pre-linguistic realm of sense perception, identification and an illusory sense of unity.