Half-Said
On this page 7 sections ›
ELI5
Some truths can never be said completely — not because we lack the words, but because the very nature of truth and the human subject is that they are always split, always leaving something unsaid. "Half-said" is Lacan's name for this unavoidable incompleteness.
Definition
Half-said (mi-dire, half-saying, half-telling) is Lacan's technical term for the structural impossibility of saying truth in full. It names a constitutive incompleteness: truth cannot be wholly articulated because jouissance—what truth aims at—operates as a limit on symbolisation. Any attempt to push truth to complete avowal would be, as Lacan says, "the worst." The half-said is therefore not a deficiency of speech but a positive structural law: "half-saying is the law internal to every kind of stating the truth." This law is homologous to the divided subject (split by language, barred as $), so truth's incompleteness mirrors the subject's own constitutive division—"that only half of it can be said" is a truth about both truth and the subject that bears it.
The concept also governs interpretation in the clinic. Analytic interpretation partakes of the half-said precisely because neither a pure riddle (stating without statement) nor a pure quotation (statement invoking authorial authority) achieves completion. The analyst's speech, like myth, incarnates the law of half-saying. In later formulations, Woman is identified with truth, and therefore equally subject to the same bar: she can "only be half-said," which is why the definite article "the Woman" must be barred. The half-said is thus simultaneously an epistemological, ethical, clinical, and ontological concept: it circumscribes the zone where the symbolic encounters its real limit.
Evolution
In the Seminar 17 period (the "discourses" period, circa 1969–70), Lacan introduces mi-dire in two registers simultaneously. First, he frames it as the structural property of analytic interpretation: interpretation can only "half tell" because it operates through either the riddle or the quotation, both of which are incomplete by nature (seminar-17, p. 48). Second, he states it as a general law of truth-stating: "half-saying is the law internal to every kind of stating the truth, and what best incarnates it, is myth" (seminar-17, p. 133). At this stage the concept is primarily linked to the Discourse of the Analyst and the knowledge/truth split, where knowledge (S2) occupies the place of truth but can never fully articulate it.
In Seminar 18 (still the discourses period, 1971), Lacan deepens the ontological dimension: the half-said is rooted in the "irremediable division between enjoyment and the semblance." Truth is to "enjoy being a semblance," and any attempt to say the whole truth collapses into alternating lies—the two halves of truth (jouissance and semblance) can only assert themselves by denying each other (seminar-18, p. 162). The astronomical metaphor—equatorial astronomy that "produced nothing"—figures this sterile alternation.
By Seminar 20 (the encore-real period, 1972–73), the concept reaches its fullest elaboration. Mi-dire is now explicitly anchored in jouissance as the limit of avowal: "the truth that is borne out by guarding against going as far as avowal, which would be the worst" (seminar-20-bruce-fink, p. 103). Simultaneously, Woman is identified with truth and therefore with the half-said: "it is at the level at which the woman is the truth. And that is why it/she can only be half-said" (seminar-20-cormac-gallagher, p. 221). The half-said becomes the formal counterpart of the not-all (pas-toute) logic of feminine sexuation.
In the topology-Borromean period (Seminar 23, 1975), the concept is reformulated topologically: "the only truth is one that can only be said, just like the subject that it comprises… only half of it can be said" (seminar-23, p. 23). Here half-saying is explicitly homologous to the divided subject, and Lacan presents it as his correction of Freud's aspirations. A secondary-literature extension appears in Zupančič (alenka-zupancic-ethics, p. 175), who applies mi-dire retroactively to Kant's categorical imperative, arguing that the moral law is structurally a "half-said" because it requires the subject's act to complete what the law itself cannot pre-specify.
Key formulations
Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (p.133)
half-saying is the law internal to every kind of stating the truth, and what best incarnates it, is myth.
This is Lacan's most compressed axiomatic statement of mi-dire: it elevates the half-said from a clinical observation to a structural law governing all truth-claims, and links it to the Analyst's discourse via myth.
Seminar XX · Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge (p.103)
the truth that is borne out by guarding against going as far as avowal... the truth of the half-telling (mi-dire), the truth that is borne out by guarding against going as far as avowal, which would be the worst.
This formulation makes jouissance explicit as the limit of full avowal and frames analytic practice as a strategic incompleteness—going all the way to avowal would be the worst, not merely impossible.
Seminar XXIII · The Sinthome (p.23)
the only truth is one that can only be said, just like the subject that it comprises. That only half of it can be said. That can only, to express it as I have stated it, be halfsaid.
In the final topological period Lacan makes the homology between the divided subject and the half-said explicit: truth's incompleteness is structurally identical to the subject's constitutive split.
Seminar XX · Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge (p.221)
it is at the level at which the woman is the truth. And that is why it/she can only be half-said.
This is the pivotal sexuation formulation: Woman's identification with truth means she inherits the structural bar of mi-dire, grounding the crossed-out 'the' (La) in the logic of the not-all.
Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (p.48)
one can only ever half tell it... these two registers, in so far as they partake of the half-said, give the medium - and, as one might say, the ethics - under which interpretation intervenes
This passage connects the half-said directly to the ethics of analytic interpretation, showing that the structural incompleteness of the riddle and the quotation is not a flaw but the very medium through which the analyst acts.
Cited examples
The Kantian categorical imperative as a 'half-said' [mi-dire] *(social_theory)*
Cited by Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan (p.175). Zupančič borrows Lacan's mi-dire to show that Kant's moral law is structurally incomplete: it prescribes only the form of a law of nature (the 'type'), not a determinable content, and thus requires the subject's act to complete what the law cannot say in advance. The categorical imperative cannot be 'read off' from itself—it is a 'half-law' that awaits actualisation.
Myth as the best incarnation of half-saying in the Discourse of the Analyst *(social_theory)*
Cited by Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (p.133). Lacan invokes myth (implicitly the Oedipus myth) as the exemplary case of half-saying: myth places knowledge in the position of truth in the Analyst's discourse, yet by its very structure as narrative it can never fully articulate the truth it gestures toward. This makes myth the structural model for how analytic interpretation operates.
The riddle (stating without statement) and the quotation (statement invoking authorial authority) as the two registers of analytic interpretation *(social_theory)*
Cited by Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (p.48). Lacan uses these two literary/rhetorical forms to show that interpretation is structurally half-said: the riddle has no full statement to back it, while the quotation invokes an absent author. Both enact the law of mi-dire in the clinical setting, demonstrating that the analyst's speech is constitutively incomplete.
Tensions
Within the corpus
Is the half-said primarily a property of truth's relation to jouissance (a limit from below, the body), or primarily a property of the divided subject's structure (a limit from language)?
Lacan (Seminar 20): the half-said is grounded in jouissance as the limit of avowal — 'the truth sought is precisely that which rules this enjoyment... the whole truth is what cannot be said... to only half-say it.' The body and its jouissance constitute the real barrier to full articulation. — cite: jacques-lacan-seminar-20-cormac-gallagher p.175
Lacan (Seminar 23): the half-said is grounded in the subject's constitutive division by language — 'the only truth is one that can only be said, just like the subject that it comprises. That only half of it can be said.' The split subject, not jouissance per se, is the structural source. — cite: jacques-lacan-seminar-23-cormac-gallagher p.23
These are not fully incompatible, but the emphasis shifts: in Seminar 20 the limit is the real of jouissance; by Seminar 23 the limit is recast topologically as the divided subject itself, reflecting the broader shift to the Borromean framework.
Across frameworks
vs Humanistic Self Actualization
Lacanian: For Lacan, truth is structurally half-said because jouissance and the split subject make full articulation impossible and, crucially, undesirable — 'going as far as avowal would be the worst.' Incompleteness is not a failure but the very condition of the analytic act and of ethical subjectivity. The analyst aims not at a final, complete self-disclosure but at producing the remainder that drives the subject's desire.
Humanistic Self Actualization: Humanistic and self-actualisation frameworks (Rogers, Maslow) treat genuine self-expression as both possible and therapeutically imperative. The ideal of 'congruence' (Rogers) requires that the person's inner experience be fully and accurately communicated. Incompleteness in self-expression is a symptom of defensive incongruence to be overcome, not a structural law to be respected. Full transparency to oneself and others is the goal of growth.
Fault line: Lacanian theory holds that truth is constitutively and permanently half-said, making total self-expression structurally impossible and even dangerous; humanistic self-actualisation theory treats full authentic expression as a reachable therapeutic ideal and the ground of psychological health.
vs Frankfurt School
Lacanian: Lacan's half-said names a formal limit internal to language and the subject: no ideology critique, no communicative rationality, no ideal speech situation can overcome it, because the barrier is jouissance and the Real, not distorted social conditions. The incompleteness of truth is not a product of power relations but of structure itself.
Frankfurt School: The Frankfurt School (Habermas in particular) grounds critical theory in an ideal of undistorted communication where truth-claims can in principle be fully redeemed through discourse. Ideological distortion is a contingent, socially produced obstacle; the telos of communicative rationality points toward a situation in which speakers can arrive at mutual understanding — a kind of 'whole saying' realisable under the right social conditions.
Fault line: For Lacan, half-saying is a structural necessity rooted in the subject's division; for the Frankfurt School (especially Habermas), incomplete or distorted communication is a contingent product of power that communicative rationality can in principle overcome.
vs Cbt
Lacanian: The Lacanian half-said treats incompleteness in articulation not as a cognitive error or avoidance but as the structural condition of all truth-speech. The analytic practice of half-saying is not a technique for eventually achieving full explicit cognition but a permanent ethical stance toward the unsymbolisable real.
Cbt: Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy posits that therapeutic progress involves making implicit beliefs explicit — bringing automatic thoughts into full conscious articulation so they can be evaluated and restructured. The goal is comprehensive verbalisable self-knowledge; where a patient 'half-says' something, CBT works to surface the full proposition behind it. Incompleteness is a target, not a principle.
Fault line: CBT treats incomplete articulation as a therapeutic problem to be resolved through explication; Lacanian theory treats it as the irreducible structural law of truth that the analyst must work with rather than against.
All occurrences
Where it appears in the corpus (26)
-
#01
Against Understanding, Volume 1: Commentary and Critique in a Lacanian Key · Bruce Fink · p.25
AGAINST UNDERSTANDING
Theoretical move: Fink argues that psychoanalytic change operates through the putting-into-words of the unspeakable rather than through understanding or meaning-making; understanding and meaning serve ego rationalization and resist analytic transformation, so the analyst's task is to dismantle meaning and bring the unconscious to speech without providing mastery.
It is about saying what has always seemed unsayable (see, for example, Lacan, 1971–72), unthinkable, unacceptable, and/or unimaginable to the analysand.
-
#02
Against Understanding, Volume 1: Commentary and Critique in a Lacanian Key · Bruce Fink · p.64
**Notes**
Theoretical move: This notes section elaborates the theoretical architecture of the imaginary vs. symbolic distinction by clarifying edge cases: animal behaviour as purely imaginary (no symbolic duping), the superego as that which creates ego interiority in neurosis vs. remaining "outside" in psychosis, and the symbolic as language operating in a particular manner rather than speech per se.
Lacan considers this to be one of the goals the neurotic analysand eventually sets him- or herself: le bien dire, to put it well.
-
#03
Against Understanding, Volume 1: Commentary and Critique in a Lacanian Key · Bruce Fink · p.121
**The Virtual Impossibility of Understanding**
Theoretical move: A psychoanalytic ethics grounded in the unconscious requires a principled stance of nonmastery and deferred understanding—a "virtual impossibility of understanding"—which Fink operationalizes both clinically (attending to the analysand's jouissance and discourse without presuming comprehension) and hermeneutically (refusing to stabilize Lacan's polysemic textual meanings).
Like Lacan, analysands often have a specific referent in mind when they say 'he' or 'she,' but the referent may have been mentioned quite some time before and be anything but obvious to the listener.
-
#04
Against Understanding, Volume 1: Commentary and Critique in a Lacanian Key · Bruce Fink · p.147
**On page 255/47 there is an interesting moment when you translate a certain pronoun as "she," which Sheridan rendered as "he." What happened here?**
Theoretical move: The passage makes a translational-theoretical point: French's use of the definite article collapses general and particular reference, and Lacan deliberately exploits this ambiguity and deferred pronominal reference to enact a textual practice that puts the reader to work — a move with direct consequences for how concepts like "the hysteric's desire" are to be interpreted.
Lacan is not always very careful with his pronominal references in the text... It's just one of the many ways in which he puts the reader to work.
-
#05
Against Understanding, Volume 2: Cases and Commentary in a Lacanian Key · Bruce Fink · p.93
<span id="page-36-0"></span>[WHAT'S SO DIFFERENT ABOUT](#page-7-0) LACAN'S APPROACH TO PSYCHOANALYSIS? > **The Title of the Seminar** > COMMENTARY
Theoretical move: Fink argues that Lacan's seminar title "A discourse that would not be of semblance" operates as an overdetermined hypothesis rather than a testable proposition: semblance and truth are not opposites but strictly correlated dimensions, so any discourse aspiring to bypass semblance risks the illusion of unmediated access to truth—a move Lacan's own framework forecloses.
speech that can only half-speak the truth, or speak the truth halfway, instead of telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth
-
#06
Against Understanding, Volume 2: Cases and Commentary in a Lacanian Key · Bruce Fink · p.104
<span id="page-36-0"></span>[WHAT'S SO DIFFERENT ABOUT](#page-7-0) LACAN'S APPROACH TO PSYCHOANALYSIS? > **The Phallus**
Theoretical move: Fink argues that Lacan's concept of the phallus is not a biological organ but the structural operator of linguistic mediation itself — simultaneously the signifier of desire, the bar between signifier and signified, the obstacle to any sexual relationship, and ultimately identical with semblance — such that language as a whole possesses only one signification (the phallus), and all speech is motivated by the non-existence of the sexual relation.
Truth involves getting off on making believe (or pretending) [jouir à faire semblant], and not admitting in any case that the reality of each of these two halves [jouissance and semblance] only predominates by affirming itself to be based on the other, namely, by lying alternately through our teeth. Such is the half-saying of truth.
-
#07
Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan · Alenka Zupančič · p.175
Between the Moral Law and the Superego > The status of the law
Theoretical move: The moral law in Kant has the structure of an enunciation without a statement—a "half-said"—and is constituted retroactively by the subject's act rather than pre-existing it; this convergence with Lacan's account of desire as the desire of the Other allows Zupančič to distinguish two ethical paths: the superego's pursuit of an Other that knows, versus the act that creates what the Law wants.
the type is the law, but not 'the whole' law (since it is a law of nature taken only in its form). The type is a 'half-law', just as the categorical imperative is a 'half-said' [mi-dire].
-
#08
Bodies to Wear: Four Lacanian Takes on Trans · Patricia Gherovici · p.42
BODIES TO WEAR FOUR LACANIAN TAKES ON TRANS > FOUR LACANIAN TAKES TO RETHINK THE TRANS EXPERIENCE > REALNESS
Theoretical move: The passage argues that Lacan's Real—irreducible to both the Symbolic and the Imaginary, tied to trauma, foreclosure, repetition, and the sexual non-relation—offers a more rigorous framework than either Heidegger's unconcealment or Butler's performativity for understanding trans "realness," insofar as the Real names the constitutive impossibility (of full symbolization, of sexual complementarity) that underpins both gender identity and psychic structure.
Not the whole truth, because there's no way to say it all. Saying it all is literally impossible: words fail. Yet it's through this very impossibility that the truth holds onto the real.
-
#09
Bodies to Wear: Four Lacanian Takes on Trans · Patricia Gherovici · p.52
BODIES TO WEAR FOUR LACANIAN TAKES ON TRANS > FOUR LACANIAN TAKES TO RETHINK THE TRANS EXPERIENCE > BEING REAL
Theoretical move: The passage deploys Lacan's sinthome as the theoretical framework for understanding trans "realness" as a singular, creative solution to existential impasse — neither mere passing nor a flight from the Real, but a livable engagement with it — while grounding this claim in clinical vignettes that demonstrate how phallic lack and creative supplementation open the way to desire.
This is a truth that, like Lacan's statement about the truth, can only ever be half-said, gesturing toward an unapproachable fullness of being without ever fully capturing it.
-
#10
Bodies to Wear: Four Lacanian Takes on Trans · Patricia Gherovici · p.72
BODIES TO WEAR FOUR LACANIAN TAKES ON TRANS > FOUR LACANIAN TAKES TO RETHINK THE TRANS EXPERIENCE > BEING REAL
Theoretical move: The passage argues that "realness"—as experienced clinically and in trans testimony—occupies a liminal space between Lacan's Real and ordinary reality, and proposes that deception, the veil of the phallus, and metonymic displacement of the objet a are constitutive of truth rather than opposed to it; psychoanalysis can learn from the trans concept of realness a more capacious understanding of the arc between the reality principle and fullness of being.
As Lacan says in Television, truth in psychoanalysis being aligned with the Real, thus can only be half-said.
-
#11
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part15.xhtml_ncx_57"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part15.xhtml_page_0075"></span>***E*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part15.xhtml_ncx_63"></span>**ethics**
Theoretical move: Lacan's analytic ethic is defined against both traditional (Aristotelian/Kantian) ethics and the normative ethics of ego-psychology, positioning it as an ethic of desire — and later of 'speaking well' — that refuses the Sovereign Good, the pleasure principle, and the 'service of goods' in favour of the subject's fidelity to their desire.
In the 1970s he shifts the emphasis of psychoanalytic ethics from the question of acting … to the question of speech; it now becomes an ethic of 'speaking well' (l'éthique du Bien-dire).
-
#12
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_185"></span>**Signification**
Theoretical move: Lacan's concept of 'signification' undergoes a trajectory from a vague association with meaningfulness to a precise, imaginary-order process in which the play of signifiers produces the illusion of the signified through metonymy and metaphor, with the bar in the Saussurean algorithm marking not a bond but a rupture—a theoretical move that radically inverts Saussure's stable sign relation.
Psychoanalytic interpretations go against signification and bear on meaning and its correlate, non-meaning (non-sens).
-
#13
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part30.xhtml_ncx_202"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part30.xhtml_page_0231"></span>***T*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part30.xhtml_ncx_211"></span>**truth**
Theoretical move: Lacan's concept of truth is irreducibly plural in its functions: it is always particular (not universal), tied to desire and speech rather than exactitude or science, and structurally intertwined with deception, fiction, and the Real—making it impossible to reduce to a single definition while remaining central to psychoanalytic ethics and treatment.
it is impossible to articulate the whole truth, and '[precisely because of this impossibility, truth aspires to the real'
-
#14
An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans
<span id="9781134780112_Part14.xhtml_ncx_43"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part14.xhtml_page_0056"></span>***D*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part14.xhtml_ncx_49"></span>**desire**
Theoretical move: This passage establishes Desire as the central concept of Lacanian theory by distinguishing it rigorously from Need and Demand, grounding it in the Hegelian-Kojèvian framework of mutual recognition, and defining it structurally as a relation to Lack caused by Objet petit a rather than a relation to any satisfiable object.
there is a fundamental 'incompatibility between desire and speech' (E, 275)… whenever speech attempts to articulate desire, there is always a leftover, a surplus, which exceeds speech.
-
#15
Irrepressible Truth: On Lacan's 'The Freudian Thing' · Adrian Johnston · p.125
**6** > <span id="page-113-0"></span>**Resistance to the Resisters** > He continues in the subsequent paragraph:
Theoretical move: Against ego-psychological defense analysis, Johnston argues that Lacan's Hegelian-Freudian conception of truth—whereby the unconscious always at least half-says the truth through even the ego's resistances—requires analysts to treat everything said (and unsaid) as analytically interpretable, repositioning the Symbolic big Other as the true interlocutor rather than the imaginary dyad of egos.
one always at least half-says (mi-dire) the truth, and even one's most deceptive lies cannot help but inadvertently disclose the truth to an appropriately attentive addressee
-
#16
Irrepressible Truth: On Lacan's 'The Freudian Thing' · Adrian Johnston · p.251
**13** > <span id="page-248-0"></span>**Conclusion Taking It to the Dogs: Actaeon's Revenge**
Theoretical move: The passage traces the continuity and evolution of Lacan's "return to Freud" from "The Freudian Thing" (1955) through the early 1970s seminars, arguing that while Lacan jettisons his mid-1950s Heideggerianism (recasting ontology as "hontology"), he remains faithful to Freudian truth-as-unconscious, now reframed through the mythological figures of Diana and Actaeon as condensations of das Ding, the sexual non-rapport, jouissance, and the half-said.
he identifies la Chose comme vérité as a "mi-dire" (half-saying) situated between "jouissance" and "semblance."
-
#17
Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.48
*[A porter appears]*
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that the Discourse of the Hysteric underlies both philosophical discourse (Hegel as "the most sublime of hysterics") and analytic experience, and that the structure of psychoanalytic interpretation operates through a logic of the "half-said" — figured as either a riddle (stating without statement) or a quotation (statement invoking authorial authority) — with the analyst functioning as Objet petit a and cause of desire rather than Subject Supposed to Know.
one can only ever half tell it... these two registers, in so far as they partake of the half-said, give the medium - and, as one might say, the ethics - under which interpretation intervenes
-
#18
Seminar XVII · The Other Side of Psychoanalysis · Jacques Lacan · p.133
Seminar 8: Wednesday 11 March 1970
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that surplus-jouissance (plus-de-jouir) is the structural analogue of Marxian surplus value within the Discourse of the Master, and that the Discourse of the Analyst uniquely situates knowledge in the place of truth — a position occupied by myth and governed by the law of half-saying — thereby reframing the Oedipus complex as myth rather than clinical universal.
half-saying is the law internal to every kind of stating the truth, and what best incarnates it, is myth.
-
#19
Seminar XVIII · On a Discourse That Might Not Be a Semblance · Jacques Lacan · p.162
**Seminar 8: Wednesday 19 May 1971** > - We can't hear you!
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the hysteric's desire—structurally unsatisfied because it emphasises the invariance of the unknown—functions as a formal schema for the logic of the Not-all (pas-toute), such that 'a woman' can only emerge by sliding beyond the hysteric's phallic semblance; simultaneously, Lacan grounds the unconscious-structured-like-a-language thesis in the irreducible division between jouissance and semblance, and links truth to half-saying rather than full articulation.
Such is the half-saying of the truth. Its astronomy is equatorial, in other words already completely out of date when it was born from the couple night-day.
-
#20
Seminar XX · Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge · Jacques Lacan · p.103
**VII** > A love letter *(une lettre d'amour)* > **Knowledge and truth**
Theoretical move: Lacan argues that truth can only be "half-told" (mi-dire) because jouissance constitutes a structural limit on avowal, and that the phallic function is not necessary but merely contingent—it has "stopped not being written" through analytic experience without entering the register of the necessary or the impossible—thereby re-situating knowledge, truth, and the real within the schema of analytic discourse and the three registers.
the truth that is borne out by guarding against going as far as avowal... the truth of the half-telling (mi-dire), the truth that is borne out by guarding against going as far as avowal, which would be the worst.
-
#21
Seminar XX · Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge · Jacques Lacan · p.175
**Seminar 9: Wednesday 20 March 1973**
Theoretical move: Lacan distinguishes the true from the real by arguing that truth can only be "half-said" (because jouissance constitutes its limit), while the real is accessible only through the impasse of formalisation; the mathemes (objet a, S(Ø), $) are introduced as written supports that, unlike speech, can designate the limits where the symbolic encounters the real—culminating in the claim that the phallic function is a contingency (ceases not to be written) rather than a necessity or impossibility.
the truth sought is precisely that which...rules this enjoyment...the whole truth is what cannot be said. It is what can only be said on condition of not pushing it to the end; to only half-say it.
-
#22
Seminar XX · Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge · Jacques Lacan · p.221
J.Lacan-... of this?
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the 'not-all' logic governing Woman cannot be read through finite Aristotelian particularity (which would imply an exceptional existence), but only through the infinite—where no determinate exception can be constructed—grounding Lacan's claim that Woman is properly half-said, and that her enjoyment is of the order of the infinite rather than the phallic universal.
it is at the level at which the woman is the truth. And that is why it/she can only be half-said.
-
#23
Seminar XXIII · The Sinthome · Jacques Lacan · p.23
**Seminar 2: Wednesday 9 December 1975**
Theoretical move: Lacan pivots the Borromean knot from a topological figure to a methodological foundation, arguing that the knot's three-fold structure (Symbolic/Imaginary/Real) captures the subject as constitutively divided by language, which operates not as an organ or message but by making a hole in the Real — thereby placing psychoanalysis in opposition to both science's objectivism and Chomsky's organicist linguistics.
the only truth is one that can only be said, just like the subject that it comprises. That only half of it can be said. That can only, to express it as I have stated it, be halfsaid.
-
#24
Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection · Julia Kristeva · p.201
POWERS OF HORROR > WRITING HATRED
Theoretical move: Kristeva argues that Céline's deployment of slang and colloquial speech is not merely ideological posturing but a calculated enunciation strategy: by smuggling spoken language into writing, Céline uses the signifier itself to carry an overflow of emotion, producing syntactic and prosodic transformations that downgrade the logical dominant of written language and approach an emptiness of meaning.
syntactic ellipsis, more or less recoverable, which appears in the later novels
-
#25
Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience · Adrian Johnston & Catherine Malabou · p.174
11.
Theoretical move: The passage argues that anxiety, as the sole non-deceptive affect, is generated structurally by the parlêtre's immersion in sociosymbolic configurations (discourses) that make self-objectification and intrasubjective self-knowledge radically uncertain; and it proposes a "return to Lacan" analogous to Lacan's return to Freud in order to develop an affective metapsychology that addresses the non-transparency of feeling to itself — the "unfinished" dimension of the Lacanian-Freudian Copernican revolution.
one always can wonder warily, in a gesture of self-objectification, whether one honestly feels what one seemingly feels… What could be more anxiety-inducing than feeling that one cannot trust one's feelings, that one's heart and soul might tell half-truths or utter falsehoods?
-
#26
Transgender Psychoanalysis: A Lacanian Perspective on Sexual Difference · Patricia Gherovici · p.90
**SIMULATION, EXPRESSION, AND TRUTH**
Theoretical move: By reading Freud's *prôton pseudos* as "fallacy" rather than "lie," Gherovici argues that hysteria's founding logic is one of constitutive undecidability between error, deception, and creativity—and leverages this to propose that the analyst must listen to trans patients the way Freud listened to hysterics: allowing unconscious errancy to disclose subjective truth rather than reducing subjects to objects of classification.
Language cannot lie even if it never tells the whole truth. You need a hysteric to show you that perfection is never complete but needs a supplement, an excess of truth.