Canonical general 28 occurrences

Gerede

ELI5

Idle talk is what happens when people keep repeating things they've heard without ever really checking whether those things are true or meaningful—like gossip or academic buzzwords that sound smart but nobody actually thinks through, so the words keep spreading while the real question gets buried.

Definition

Gerede (idle talk) is Heidegger's term for the fallen, inauthentic mode of discourse in which "what is said" (das Gesagte) circulates independently of "that about which" discourse speaks (das Worüber). Rather than passing through language toward genuine disclosure of the world, Gerede passes language along—repeating, re-circulating, and progressively uprooting speech from its original referential ground. The result is not mere incomprehensibility but a "sham clarity" (Scheinklarheit): the trivial appears fully intelligible precisely because no one is looking through it anymore. In this way, Gerede functions as the linguistic medium of dissimulation (Verstellung)—not intentional lying but a structural covering-over in which matters remain hidden behind the smooth surface of what "one says." It is positioned as the intermediate term between authentic Rede (genuine speech) and Geschwätz (babble), occupying a communicative spectrum from Aletheia to Pseudos.

Crucially, Gerede is not a merely contingent social failing but an ontological structure of Dasein's being-with-others. Because all communication is inherently interpretive—presenting something to someone from a certain perspective—the possibility of misinterpretation and repetition-without-recourse-to-the-matter is built into logos itself. Idle talk is therefore the indigenous condition of possibility for concept formation and world-conception in average everydayness, which makes it paradoxically both the obstacle to genuine inquiry and its structural precondition. As the constitutive medium of das Man, Gerede supplies Dasein with a "definite comprehension which Dasein in advance has of itself"—the guise in which Dasein encounters itself anonymously, substituting publicness and averageness for resolute self-understanding. Authenticity is not an escape from Gerede but an existentiell modification of the everyday structure Gerede constitutes.

Evolution

McCormick's genealogical reconstruction shows that Gerede did not arrive fully formed in Being and Time (1927) but was forged across a decade of Heidegger's professional marginalization and early Freiburg lectures. In the War Emergency Semester of 1919 and the 1921–22 lecture course on Aristotle, Heidegger deployed Geschwätz, Gerede, and Geschreibe as a cluster of inauthentic communicative practices—babble, idle talk, and idle writing—as the negative pole against which genuine "resolute understanding" (Entschlossenheit) and phenomenological inquiry were defined. At this stage (source: samuel-mccormick, pp. 147–155), the concept is primarily a normative, social-critical tool aimed at university reform discourse and worldview philosophy in the Weimar Republic; idle talk is Gerede as "unscientific idle talk" characterizing academic speech severed from lived experience.

By the summer 1923 hermeneutics of facticity course, Gerede acquires a more properly ontological register: it becomes the "basic movedness" of Dasein itself, the how of Dasein's average interpretedness (Ausgelegtheit), supplying das Man with its anonymous self-comprehension (pp. 158–163). The transition is from social critique to existential analytic. Gerede now names the structural medium of publicness, averageness, and ruinant factical life—no longer just bad academic talk but the condition of possibility for any shared intelligibility.

In the 1924 Marburg lectures on Aristotle's Rhetoric and the 1924–25 lectures on Plato's Sophist, Heidegger anchors Gerede within a full communicative hierarchy running from Geschwätz at the bottom through Gerede (as the fallen form of logos, corresponding to Pseudos and deception) up through Rede, Durchsprechen (dialectic), genuine philosophical speech, and finally nous (pure perception) (pp. 195–202). Here Gerede is theorized as intrinsic to logos itself: because logos is always the medium of both truth and error, Gerede is the potentiality for falsehood (pseudos) native to all discourse, not an external contaminant. The History of the Concept of Time (SS 1925) elaborates this in what becomes the penultimate draft of Being and Time's §35, consolidating the structural account of repetition without recourse to the expressed matter, growing groundlessness, and hearsay.

McCormick's secondary analysis traces a genealogical line from Kierkegaard's snak (chatter) and the figure of Gert Westphaler through Heidegger's Gerede to Lacan's "empty speech," arguing that the mechanical, repeating quality of chatter—anticipated in Holberg's barber and theorized by Kierkegaard—constitutes the common ancestor of both Heideggerian idle talk and Lacanian empty speech (pp. 34, 63). This genealogy situates Gerede not as a purely Heideggerian invention but as the philosophical crystallization of a longer conceptual history of everyday talk running from Socratic eironeia through Kierkegaard's critique of Danish Hegelianism.

Key formulations

The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.214)

the pseudocommunicative practice of Gerede is its disingenuous sibling, ever luring Dasein in the opposite direction. As it reorients Dasein toward average everydayness, idle talk threatens to leave it completely disoriented in the realm of inauthentic existence.

This formulation captures Gerede's essential structure as pseudo-communication—passing along the said rather than through it—and its existential stakes as a directional pull toward inauthenticity.

The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.158)

This discourse 'about' itself is the public and average manner in which Dasein takes itself in hand, holds onto itself, and preserves itself. What lies in this idle talk [Gerede] is a definite comprehension which Dasein in advance has of itself

This is Heidegger's ontological elevation of Gerede from social critique to existential structure: idle talk is not incidental noise but the primary medium through which Dasein holds a pre-understanding of itself within das Man.

The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.182)

Idle talk [Gerede], the 'way in which one speaks about things,' is authoritative for the world-conception itself.

Captures the paradox at the heart of Gerede: despite being groundless and dissimulating, it is foundational—the condition of possibility for shared world-conception and intelligibility in average everydayness.

The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.199)

Logos is at first idle talk [Gerede], whose facticity is not to let things be seen [sehen] but instead to develop a peculiar self-satisfaction at adhering to what is idly spoken of [was man so sagt].

This formulation establishes Gerede as the default, originary mode of logos—not a deviation but the starting point of all discourse, characterized by sagen without sehen, speech without genuine disclosure.

The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.163)

If Gerede is the guise in which Dasein encounters itself as das Man, Betriebsamkeit is the illusion of modern public life on which Gerede thrives.

This formulation articulates the structural co-dependency between Gerede and Betriebsamkeit (busyness), showing that idle talk is not merely linguistic but is sustained by the temporal and social conditions of modern public life.

Cited examples

Heidegger's critique of Weimar-era university reform discourse—the 'speeches and pamphlets' of academic philosophers calling for 'spiritual renewal' (history)

Cited by The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.147). McCormick shows that Heidegger first theorized Gerede against the backdrop of Weimar university reform rhetoric: programmatic speeches and pamphlets that substituted noisy worldview synthesis for genuine scientific inquiry. This context reveals Gerede as simultaneously a phenomenological category and a social critique of institutionalized academic chatter.

Academic jargon and catchwords/catchphrases circulating in pre-war German universities (e.g., 'tendencies' before WWI used as buzzwords) (case_study)

Cited by The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.211). Heidegger uses the coinage and circulation of academic catchphrases as the primary empirical index of Gerede in modern intellectual culture: catchwords are indices of idle talk as a mode of being of Dasein in das Man, showing how doxa systematically covers up aletheia through repeated, groundless linguistic currency.

Freud's dream of Irma's injection—specifically the speech of Dr. M. ('no matter' / es macht nichts) and Leopold's diagnosis yielding 'a vague notion of something in the nature of a metastatic affection' (case_study)

Cited by The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.236). McCormick maps Heidegger's Gerede onto the groundless medical discourse in Freud's dream, arguing that Leopold's and Dr. M.'s speech brings 'what is understood to a sham clarity'—words that cover over rather than disclose the traumatic condition, functioning as Heideggerian idle talk within a psychoanalytic scene.

Kierkegaard's figure of the 'Hegelian Gert Westphalers'—Danish disciples of Hegel who pass Hegelian ideas from mouth to mouth without genuine understanding (history)

Cited by The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.52). The Hegelian Gert Westphalers illustrate Kierkegaard's precursor concept of snak as a form of sophistic windbagging and deceived windsucking that anticipates Heidegger's Gerede: the transmission of Hegel's 'absolute method' through Danish academic culture becomes idle circulation of the said without recourse to the matter.

Holberg's Master Gert Westphaler—a fictional barber whose compulsive, mechanically repetitive chatter disrupts every social occasion (literature)

Cited by The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday TalkSamuel McCormick · 2020 (p.34). McCormick treats Master Gert as the literary prototype for the conceptual history of idle talk: his automated, repeating chatter—likened to a pantograph or double-barreled rifle—demonstrates the mechanical, self-perpetuating character of Gerede that would later be theorized by both Heidegger and Lacan.

Tensions

Within the corpus

Whether Gerede is primarily an ontological-existential structure constitutive of Dasein's being, or primarily a normative/social-critical concept that diagnoses deficient communicative practices.

  • McCormick (early Heidegger, 1921–22): Gerede functions as a normative concept—the negative pole against which genuine scientific consciousness is defined, a diagnosis of university culture and worldview philosophy. 'If it doesn't succeed in awakening such consciousness positively and concretely in the youth, then all chatter [Gerede] about the crisis of science and the like is just chatter [Gerede].' — cite: samuel-mccormick-the-chattering-mind-a-conceptual-history-of-everyday-talk-unive p. 141

  • McCormick (Heidegger SS 1923 and Being and Time): Gerede is an ontological-existential structure—the 'how' of Dasein's average interpretedness and the constitutive medium of das Man's self-comprehension, not merely a communicative failure but the indigenous condition of world-conception. 'Idle talk [Gerede], the way in which one speaks about things, is authoritative for the world-conception itself.' — cite: samuel-mccormick-the-chattering-mind-a-conceptual-history-of-everyday-talk-unive p. 182

    This tension maps onto Heidegger's own developmental arc: the shift from social critique to existential analytic, with significant consequences for whether Gerede can be overcome or only modified.

Whether authenticity is a genuine escape from or merely a modal modification of Gerede/inauthentic existence.

  • McCormick citing Being and Time: 'Authentic existence is not something which floats above falling everydayness; existentially, it is only a modified [modifiziertes] way in which such everydayness is seized upon'—implying Gerede is the condition of possibility for authenticity, not its opposite. — cite: samuel-mccormick-the-chattering-mind-a-conceptual-history-of-everyday-talk-unive p. 218

  • McCormick citing Being and Time elsewhere: 'Inauthenticity is based on the possibility of authenticity'—suggesting the priority runs the other way, with authenticity as the more primordial ground from which Gerede represents a falling-away. — cite: samuel-mccormick-the-chattering-mind-a-conceptual-history-of-everyday-talk-unive p. 218

    McCormick flags this as among the most contested interpretive cruxes of Being and Time, noting that Taylor Carman treats it as either the only explicit contradiction in the text or an authorial blunder.

Across frameworks

vs Frankfurt School

Lacanian: For Heidegger (and for Lacan's parallel concept of empty speech), Gerede is an ontological-existential structure, not a product of specific historical-economic conditions. Idle talk belongs to the universal structure of Dasein's being-with-others; it is not caused by capitalism or ideology but is constitutive of average everydayness as such. The remedy, if any, lies in an existentiell modification of the subject's own relation to disclosure, not in structural transformation of society.

Frankfurt School: The Frankfurt School (Adorno, Horkheimer) would situate idle talk within the culture industry and the logic of reification: the 'sham clarity' of Gerede is not a structural feature of language as such but the ideological effect of commodity culture, which reduces language to exchangeable units. Authentic speech is foreclosed not by ontological fallenness but by the administered world's colonization of communicative reason (Habermas). The cure is critical theory and emancipatory practice, not existentiell resolution.

Fault line: Ontological universalism vs. historical-materialist specificity: Heidegger treats Gerede as an a-historical existential, while the Frankfurt School insists that deficient discourse is a historically produced, socially remediable condition tied to specific forms of domination.

vs Humanistic Self Actualization

Lacanian: Heidegger's Gerede does not represent a failure of an underlying authentic self to express itself; rather, the 'authentic self' is itself only accessible as an existentiell modification of the inauthentic structure Gerede constitutes. There is no pre-linguistic, pre-social core self waiting to speak genuinely—Dasein is always already thrown into interpretedness and averageness. Authenticity is a mode of owning fallenness, not transcending it.

Humanistic Self Actualization: Humanistic psychology (Rogers, Maslow) understands idle talk as a defense mechanism or manifestation of conditional regard that suppresses the organism's authentic self-expression. The person who chatters inauthentically does so because genuine feelings and needs are blocked by social conditioning; the therapeutic goal is to remove those conditions and allow genuine, congruent self-expression to emerge from an inherently healthy core.

Fault line: The existence or non-existence of a pre-discursive authentic core: humanistic theory posits an original self distorted by social pressure, while Heidegger insists there is no such pre-social subject—Gerede is constitutive, not merely suppressive.

vs Cbt

Lacanian: Heidegger's Gerede is not a cognitive distortion to be identified and corrected; it is the structural medium of Dasein's average existence, not an error in reasoning. The 'sham clarity' of idle talk is not a false belief amenable to Socratic disputation but an ontological feature of how language circulates in the public world, severing the said from the about-which through repetition rather than faulty inference.

Cbt: CBT would treat habitual, unreflective chatter as a form of cognitive avoidance or automatic thinking—patterns of speech that reinforce maladaptive schemas by allowing the patient to bypass genuine emotional and cognitive engagement. The intervention is to slow down automatic speech, identify the underlying beliefs, and test them against evidence, thereby restoring the link between speech and its referents through structured reflection.

Fault line: Structural vs. corrective models of language failure: for Heidegger, Gerede is an existential condition that can only be modified from within; for CBT, unreflective talk is a learnable bad habit that cognitive restructuring can remedy.

All occurrences

Where it appears in the corpus (28)

  1. #01

    An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis · Dylan Evans

    <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_173"></span><span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_page_0195"></span>***S*** > <span id="9781134780112_Part29.xhtml_ncx_192"></span>**Speech**

    Theoretical move: The passage elaborates Lacan's concept of *parole* (speech) as a theoretically overdetermined term drawing on anthropology, theology, and metaphysics, and pivots on the distinction between 'full speech' and 'empty speech' as the axis along which the subject's relation to desire and truth is articulated in psychoanalytic treatment.

    Lacan draws on Heidegger's distinction between Rede (discourse) and Gerede (chatter) to elaborate his own distinction between 'full speech' (parole pleine) and 'empty speech' (parole vide)
  2. #02

    A Voice and Nothing More · Mladen Dolar · p.107

    The voice and the drive > The voice of reason

    Theoretical move: Dolar argues that the voice operates as the operator enabling a transition from the ethics of desire to the ethics of the drive, and that Heidegger's phenomenology of the call of conscience—a pure, aphonic voice that convokes Dasein to Being—illuminates the structural function of voice as extimate alterity, while simultaneously exposing the metaphysical illusion of positing voice as a pure, prelinguistic origin.

    it is a silent voice which escapes presence (that which constituted the essential foothold of the voice throughout the metaphysical tradition)
  3. #03

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.136

    Beginning More than Halfway There

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that Heidegger's key concepts of "idle talk" (Gerede), "scribbling" (Geschreibe), and "babble" (Geschwätz) were not merely abstract philosophical categories but emerged from a specific biographical and institutional context—namely, his prolonged professional marginalization within the publish-or-perish culture of the modern research university, making these concepts simultaneously communication theory and social critique.

    Heidegger conceived of 'idle talk' (Gerede) and several related terms— notably 'babble' (Geschwätz), 'scribbling' (Geschreibe), and 'everyday discourse' (alltägliche Rede) during this decade-long period of scholarly silence and professional strife.
  4. #04

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.214

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Babbling** *Bathos*

    Theoretical move: The passage traces Heidegger's communicative spectrum from authentic Rede through Gerede to Geschwätz, arguing that the fall into babbling pseudo-communication produces not mere incomprehensibility but a "sham clarity" (bathos/Trivialität) that dissolves authentic selfhood into the anonymous they-self (das Man-selbst), where standing-apart-from-others (Abständigkeit) paradoxically intensifies dependence on the very others from whom one is estranged.

    the pseudocommunicative practice of Gerede is its disingenuous sibling, ever luring Dasein in the opposite direction. As it reorients Dasein toward average everydayness, idle talk threatens to leave it completely disoriented in the realm of inauthentic existence.
  5. #05

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.52

    Barbers and Philosophers > **Wagging Tongues** > **Windbags, Windsucks, and Hegelian Gert Westphalers**

    Theoretical move: The passage deploys Kierkegaard's critique of Hegel's "absolute method" as a form of sophistic windbagging: rather than delivering on its promised philosophical rigour, the method distracts through erudite historical spectacle, and its transmission via "Hegelian Gert Westphalers" perpetuates deception across generations, turning philosophy into idle talk (*Snakketøi*).

    a report which scholars will continue to pass from mouth to mouth in reciprocal acts of deceptive windbagging and deceived windsucking… 'an instrument of distraction, nothing but an instrument of distraction'
  6. #06

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.63

    Fuzzy Math > **A Lost Count**

    Theoretical move: The passage uses Kierkegaard's degradation of collective music—from orchestrated revolutionary harmony to mechanical beat-counting—to establish 'chatter' (snak) as the linguistic medium of modernity's 'lost count': a mode of telling that accompanies automated tallying, mistaking mechanical noise for social harmony and thereby rendering the disappearance of genuine communal bonds imperceptible.

    Chatter is the linguistic medium in which this lost count proceeds... it is the dysfunctional mode of telling (at fortælle) that accompanies modernity's automated mode of tallying (at tælle).
  7. #07

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.57

    Barbers and Philosophers > **Poorly Provisioned Parrots** > **The Age of Distinctions**

    Theoretical move: Kierkegaard's critique of Danish Hegelianism hinges on the classical alazon/eiron distinction: the chattering systematicians embody the alazon's prideful self-ignorance, while Socratic irony (eironeia) marks the eccentric wisdom of those who distinguish between what they understand and what they do not—a distinction that Hegelian sublation (Aufhebung), misapplied by parroting disciples, collapses into mere gossip.

    Make no mistake, the way of speaking at issue here is chatter... ranging in form and function from noise to nonsense, cliché to bombast, wordplay to witticism, tangent to reprise, gossip to gimcrack, diversion to duplicity, tedious anecdote to absurd abstraction
  8. #08

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.202

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Modes of Concealment** > **Talking Through**

    Theoretical move: McCormick maps Heidegger's hierarchical typology of linguistic practices onto a spectrum from Truth (Aletheia) to Falsehood (Pseudos), arguing that Platonic dialectic (Durchsprechen/dialegesthai) occupies a middle position — a preparatory 'speaking-through' that cultivates seeing in one's interlocutor — which Heidegger recovers as the essential counter-move to idle talk.

    the positive task… and, on the other hand, of taking up at the same time the battle against idle talk [Gerede]
  9. #09

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.155

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **The Crisis of Learning** > **Ruinant Factical Life**

    Theoretical move: The passage traces Heidegger's early 1922 formulation of 'ruinant factical life' as constituted by inauthentic communicative practices (Gerede, Geschreibe, Geschwätz), arguing that these practices — by arresting 'resolute understanding' and abolishing historical temporality — are simultaneously the obstacle to and condition of possibility for genuine scientific inquiry, and that this analysis prefigures the existential analytic of Being and Time.

    In their Gerede and Geschreibe, he discovered an equally verbose yet slightly more focused communicative practice, an effusive state of preoccupation in which speakers and writers fixate on certain topics of discussion but never in such a way that allows for rigorous scientific inquiry.
  10. #10

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.155

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **The Crisis of Learning** > **Ruinant Factical Life**

    Theoretical move: The passage traces Heidegger's early 1922 formulation of 'ruinant factical life' as constituted by inauthentic communicative practices (Gerede, Geschreibe, Geschwätz), arguing that these practices — by arresting 'resolute understanding' and abolishing historical temporality — are simultaneously the obstacle to and condition of possibility for genuine scientific inquiry, and that this analysis prefigures the existential analytic of Being and Time.

    Gerede, Geschreibe, and Geschwätz were all hindering the conduct of scientific research and, by extension, the cultivation of scientific consciousness.
  11. #11

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.150

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **The Crisis of Learning** > **Wringing Necks**

    Theoretical move: The passage traces the pre-history of Heidegger's concept of Gerede (idle talk) through his early Freiburg lectures and his break with Husserl, arguing that his critique of worldview philosophy, popular scholarship, and university reform rhetoric anticipates the ontological-existential analysis of fallen public discourse in Being and Time.

    the loud idle talk [Gerede] which goes with the common sense of the 'they'— a fallen way of speaking characterized by 'jealous stipulations and talkative fraternizing'
  12. #12

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.236

    The Writing on the Wall > **No Matter**

    Theoretical move: The passage uses Freud's dream of Irma's injection to argue that the nonsensical speech of Dr. M. ("no matter" / *macht nichts*) functions as an instance of Heideggerian everyday discourse (*alltägliche Rede*) that simultaneously voices and covers over anxiety about being-towards-death, thereby protecting Freud's professional identity while gesturing toward a constitutive void or *Nichts*.

    Much as idle talk, according to Heidegger, 'brings what is understood to a sham clarity' (*BT*, 208), Leopold's insight into Irma's condition yielded little more than 'a vague notion of something in the nature of a metastatic affection.'
  13. #13

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.153

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **The Crisis of Learning** > **"The Book!"**

    Theoretical move: The passage traces Heidegger's early (1921–22) conceptualization of *Geschwätz* (babble), *Gerede* (idle talk), and *Geschreibe* as kindred modes of deficient discourse—marked by the recursive desire for novelty, dilettantish self-assurance, and the leveling of rigorous inquiry—showing how these concepts emerge from his critique of historiography, academic *Weltanschauung*, and the broader social pathology of modern intellectual life before their mature formulation in *Being and Time*.

    he describes this focused yet facile way of speaking about certain topics as Gerede. And when this occurs in print, he characterizes it as Geschreibe.
  14. #14

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.141

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **"He Who Publishes Nothing"**

    Theoretical move: The passage traces how Heidegger theorizes everyday philosophical chatter (Gerede) as the antithesis of genuine scientific inquiry, positioning the refusal to publish and the pedagogical encounter as the only authentic sites of philosophical work, thereby deploying Gerede as a normative concept against academic discourse.

    then all chatter [Gerede] about the crisis of science and the like is just chatter [Gerede].
  15. #15

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.171

    Ancient Figures of Speech

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that Heidegger's 1924 Marburg lectures on Aristotle ground everyday language use ontologically in *logos* as the constitutive mode of Dasein's being-with-others, such that communication is inherently interpretive and therefore structurally open to misinterpretation — a move that sets up *Gerede* as an ontological phenomenon rather than a mere social failing.

    being-there itself typically finds expression, in a discursive tangle of prevailing interpretations, attendant misinterpretations, and ever-present possibilities of error — the likes of which… prove integral to his understanding of Gerede and its garrulous siblings.
  16. #16

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.182

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Rhetorical Hermeneutics** > **Incapacitating Falsehood** > **The Yes- Man Finds His Voice**

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that *Gerede* (idle talk) is not merely a degraded or fallen form of *logos* but is paradoxically *foundational* to world-conception and concept formation in Dasein: through the mechanism of repetition without recourse to the expressed matter, *Gerede* enacts dissimulation and grounds the authority of *doxa* via the generic collectivity of *das Man*, making idle talk both the vehicle of misinterpretation and the indigenous condition of possibility for intelligibility itself.

    Idle talk [Gerede], the 'way in which one speaks about things,' is authoritative for the world-conception itself.
  17. #17

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.218

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Babbling** *Bathos* > **Scales of Existence**

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that authenticity and inauthenticity in Heidegger are not opposed states but modal counter-possibilities of each other, and that the key operative concept—*Modus*/modification—structures a descending/ascending scale of discourse (from babble to silence) as existential trajectories rather than fixed conditions, with implications for Lacan's parallel theorization of alienation and authentic existence.

    Immediately following his discussion of idle talk, curiosity, and ambiguity in *Being and Time*, Heidegger begins to excavate the existential structure of average everydayness on which they depend.
  18. #18

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.207

    Ancient Figures of Speech > The World Persuaded

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that Heidegger's analysis of everyday discourse (Rede) establishes a communicative trajectory from rhetorical persuasion through dialectical speaking-through (Durchsprechen) to authentic philosophical speech, and that the structural non-coincidence between "the said" and "the about-which" explains how Rede degenerates into idle talk (Gerede) and sophistic deception when the about-which slips away while the said remains in circulation.

    When the about- which slips away, but the said remains in circulation, we see idle talk (*Gerede*) at work.
  19. #19

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.147

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **The Crisis of Learning**

    Theoretical move: The passage traces Heidegger's early theorization of idle talk (*Gerede*) and babble (*Geschwätz*) as a critique of Weimar-era university reform discourse, establishing phenomenology as the antithesis of worldview philosophy precisely because it refuses to freeze lived experience into static, aconceptual language.

    In the former's corruption, Heidegger saw a misguided and confused yet noisily programmatic effort to reform the university by way of babbling worldviews and naive preconceptions severed from lived experience— in short, 'unscientific idle talk [Gerede]'
  20. #20

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.28

    Barbers and Philosophers

    Theoretical move: The passage traces Kierkegaard's debut as an author to an 1836 newspaper polemic, arguing that this exchange inaugurates his sustained theorization of "chatter" (snak) as a philosophical concept—identifying it with nonsense, gossip, confusion, and self-delusion—and establishes Holberg's fictional barber Gert Westphaler as the literary anchor for that theorization.

    he began to explore the role of 'chatter' in the modern world... he printed his name instead: 'S. Kierkegaard.' It was the first signed text in one of the nineteenth century's most prolific intellectual careers... and with it his work on chatter.
  21. #21

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.199

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Modes of Concealment** > **Talking Through**

    Theoretical move: Heidegger constructs a hierarchy of speech modes—from *Gerede* (idle talk) through rhetoric and dialectic (*dialegesthai*) to *nous* (pure perception)—arguing that *dialegesthai* occupies a structurally intermediate position that passes through inauthentic discourse toward genuine uncovering (*aletheuein*), without ever fully achieving the pure seeing of *theoria*, thus making authentic philosophical speech a perpetually incomplete task of cutting through concealment.

    Logos is at first idle talk [Gerede], whose facticity is not to let things be seen [sehen] but instead to develop a peculiar self-satisfaction at adhering to what is idly spoken of [was man so sagt].
  22. #22

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.211

    Ancient Figures of Speech > The World Persuaded > **Lost Examples Regained**

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that Heidegger's pre-*Being and Time* lectures develop idle talk (*Gerede*) as a structural phenomenon of academic culture, showing how the deceptive speech of the sophist and the deceived speech of the "stooge" are co-constitutive modes of *Gerede* that cover up authentic disclosure (*aletheia*) and deviate *Dasein* from itself.

    Catchwords and catchphrases are indices of idle talk [Geredes], which is a mode of being of Dasein in the Anyone [Man].
  23. #23

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.158

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **A Specter in Disguise**

    Theoretical move: By tracing Heidegger's 1923 hermeneutics of facticity lectures, the passage argues that *Gerede* (idle talk) is the constitutive medium of *das Man*'s anonymous, ruinant publicness — a phantasmatic specter that masks *Dasein*'s anxiety before itself — and that this structure is exemplified in the totalizing academic discourse of disciplinary philosophy and history, which mistake their own idle consensus for genuine inquiry.

    This discourse 'about' itself is the public and average manner in which Dasein takes itself in hand, holds onto itself, and preserves itself. What lies in this idle talk [Gerede] is a definite comprehension which Dasein in advance has of itself
  24. #24

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.195

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Modes of Concealment**

    Theoretical move: Heidegger constructs a hierarchy of spoken discourse in which *Gerede* (idle talk) operates as a double mode of concealment — first displacing natural consciousness and then solidifying common opinion into uncritically repeated truisms — thereby posing the question of whether the human being's incapacity for original appropriation is ontological or merely circumstantial.

    everyday Dasein sees the world and itself within common opinion, and maintains a definite opinion about them... It is hiddenness by way of those common opinions within which everyday life operates.
  25. #25

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.34

    Barbers and Philosophers > To which his friend replies:

    Theoretical move: By analyzing Holberg's Master Gert Westphaler through Kierkegaard's correspondence, the passage establishes "chatter" as a mechanically repetitive, jouissance-driven speech act whose automated quality anticipates Lacan's "empty speech" and Heidegger's "idle talk" — and whose pathological excess stems from narcissistic delusion rather than mere foolishness.

    Heidegger had much to say about the repetitive functions of 'idle talk,' and Lacan paid equally careful attention to the mechanical aspects of 'empty speech.'
  26. #26

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.168

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **More Impulses from Kier ke gaard** > **Holding Out and Holding Back**

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that Heidegger's philosophical concepts of resolute silence, idle talk (*Gerede*), and *Jeweiligkeit* did not originate as abstract philosophical categories but emerged from concrete careerist circumstances, revealing how the opposition between authentic reticence and inauthentic chatter was first a practical, biographical response before becoming a principled existential-phenomenological distinction.

    the loud idle talk [lauten Gerede] which goes with the common sense of the 'they' [des Man]
  27. #27

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.163

    Beginning More than Halfway There > **More Impulses from Kier ke gaard**

    Theoretical move: The passage argues that Heidegger's critique of modern public busyness (*Betriebsamkeit*) and idle talk (*Gerede*) is inseparable from his assault on the institutionalized "business" of academic philosophy—particularly phenomenology—showing that existential analysis of modernity's chatter originates in a polemical diagnosis of intellectual life in Weimar Germany, with Kierkegaard as a precursor who coined "bustling loquacity" to name the same confluence of tumult and chatter.

    If Gerede is the guise in which Dasein encounters itself as das Man, Betriebsamkeit is the illusion of modern public life on which Gerede thrives.
  28. #28

    The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.179

    Ancient Figures of Speech > **Rhetorical Hermeneutics** > **Incapacitating Falsehood**

    Theoretical move: Heidegger's early reading of Aristotle positions *doxa* as intrinsically oriented toward *aletheia* (truth-as-unconcealment), with falsehood (*pseudos*) as *doxa*'s basic potentiality and truth as its impotentiality — a logic that simultaneously recuperates rhetoric and *doxa* as modes of being-in-the-world aimed at uncovering, while acknowledging that *pseudos* typically overpowers the pull toward *aletheia*, yielding authentic *Rede* at best and inauthentic *Gerede* at worst.

    rhetoric and doxa yield only Gerede— a dislocated, indeterminate strand of logos in which inauthentic speech and false opinion allow what is spoken about and thus seen to remain hidden, concealed, and disguised.