Falling - Fleeing
ELI5
When you get totally absorbed in everyday chit-chat and ordinary worries, you're also secretly running away from asking the big, scary question of how to really live — and the very fact that you're running proves you already half-know what you're running from.
Definition
Falling-Fleeing names the double movement that Heidegger's analysis of average everydayness discloses at the heart of everyday existence: to fall into the ordinary world of quotidian concerns (Das Man, idle talk, Gerede) is simultaneously and necessarily to flee from the possibility of authentic existence. The concept captures not a sequential two-step but a single, structurally unified gesture — the very absorption in the everyday is the evasion of authenticity, and vice versa. What the concept makes visible is that this flight is not innocent: to flee from authentic existence is already to be in a certain relation to it, to carry a latent familiarity with the very possibility one evades. The flight is thus self-betraying — it testifies, however mutely, to the pressure of what is being escaped.
Within McCormick's argument (samuel-mccormick-the-chattering-mind-a-conceptual-history-of-everyday-talk-unive), this double movement is crucially non-linear in its implications. The mood of anxiety and the practice of alltägliche Rede do not simply chain the subject to inauthenticity; rather, they open indirect, circuitous routes back toward authentic existence by disclosing the world's groundlessness. The fall into everydayness is not a simple degradation but a detour in which the subject's constitutive unease with groundlessness remains live, precisely because fleeing it requires acknowledging it. Falling-Fleeing thus names the paradoxical unity of evasion and inadvertent disclosure that structures everyday communicative existence.
Place in the corpus
This concept belongs to the Heideggerean strand of McCormick's argument (samuel-mccormick-the-chattering-mind-a-conceptual-history-of-everyday-talk-unive) and functions as the hinge between two cross-referenced canonical concepts: Das Man (the anonymous "one" of social conformity that characterises average everydayness) and Alltägliche Rede / Idle Talk-Gerede (the undifferentiated, circulating speech that is the communicative medium of Das Man). Falling-Fleeing specifies the existential dynamic those concepts presuppose — it explains why absorption in Das Man and Gerede is not mere passivity but active evasion, and why that evasion is structurally self-undermining.
In relation to the Lacanian canonical concepts supplied as cross-references, Falling-Fleeing resonates most strongly with Alienation and Anxiety. Like Lacanian alienation, the structure involves a forced, non-optional condition: one cannot simply stand outside the fall into everydayness any more than the Lacanian subject can opt out of the vel of alienation. Both structures yield a losing position regardless of which "side" one occupies. The echo of Anxiety is equally strong: just as Lacanian anxiety arises not from the absence of the object but from its threatening proximity — the dread of losing the gap that constitutes desire — Falling-Fleeing identifies the flight from authentic existence as driven by a familiarity with it that is too close for comfort. The concept does not import Lacanian vocabulary, but it occupies structurally homologous terrain: the everyday is not the simple negation of authenticity but its uncanny double, much as Das Ding functions as the intimate-yet-excluded kernel of desire rather than an external Other.
Key formulations
The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk (p.223)
To fall into average everydayness and its worldly concerns is also to flee from their crucial alternative: authentic existence. And to flee from authentic existence is always to admit a certain familiarity with it.
The theoretical load of the quote is carried by the word "always" and the phrase "admit a certain familiarity with it": flight is not mere ignorance but constitutive acknowledgment — the subject's evasion of authentic existence is itself a form of recognition, making the fall into everydayness a self-betraying structure rather than a simple absence of awareness. The conjunction "also" in the first sentence is equally charged, marking falling and fleeing not as successive stages but as a single simultaneous movement.
All occurrences
Where it appears in the corpus (1)
-
#01
The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk · Samuel McCormick · p.223
Ancient Figures of Speech > **Fearless Flight**
Theoretical move: The passage maps Heidegger's communicative-existential continuum between average everydayness and authentic existence, then pivots to show how *alltägliche Rede* and the mood of anxiety open circuitous, non-linear routes to authentic existence by disclosing the world's groundlessness rather than by deliberate philosophical traversal.
To fall into average everydayness and its worldly concerns is also to flee from their crucial alternative: authentic existence. And to flee from authentic existence is always to admit a certain familiarity with it.