zizek 3 occurrences

Egalitarian Comedy

On this page 1 section

This concept page does not yet have synthesis content. The extractor flagged it as a load-bearing concept; a future synthesis pass will populate it. The All Occurrences section below shows every place it appears in the corpus.

All occurrences

Where it appears in the corpus (3)

  1. #01

    Only a Joke Can Save Us: A Theory of Comedy · Todd McGowan · p.175

    Ideology and Equality > Class Struggle at the Carnival

    Theoretical move: Comedy has no inherent political valence; the distinction between egalitarian and ideological comedy lies not in who produces or targets it, but in whether it reveals internal division/splitting in both subject and object (egalitarian) or sustains a sense of wholeness that reinforces social authority (ideological).

    Egalitarian comedy exposes the contradictions of the social order and of the subject who exists within this order. In egalitarian comedy, both the source of the comedy and its target appear divided internally.
  2. #02

    Only a Joke Can Save Us: A Theory of Comedy · Todd McGowan · p.182

    Ideology and Equality > Egalitarian Comedy

    Theoretical move: McGowan argues that genuine egalitarian comedy must expose the division within authority itself (not merely mock discursive identities), running parallel to Hegel's move in the Phenomenology that substance is always also subject; this means egalitarian comedy can target both authority figures and the excluded, provided it refuses to idealize either pole as a substantial ground.

    A genuinely egalitarian comedy must reveal that the social authority itself is not simply a discursive entity but necessarily lacking. It must show the social order and the subject as at odds with themselves.
  3. #03

    Only a Joke Can Save Us: A Theory of Comedy · Todd McGowan · p.189

    Ideology and Equality > The Fundamental Barrier

    Theoretical move: Comedy's inherently social structure—its impossibility of being enjoyed alone—generates both its ideological function (producing a superego-like pressure toward inclusion and wholeness) and the fundamental barrier to egalitarian comedy: the illusion of wholeness that its amalgam of inclusion/exclusion produces, an illusion that genuine egalitarian comedy must disrupt by showing that all wholeness is already beset by the disparate.

    the fundamental stumbling block to egalitarian comedy is not that it must exclude. It is instead the illusion of wholeness that derives from comedy's specific amalgam of inclusion and exclusion.