Biblical Parallax
ELI5
Think of how you can never see a ghost directly — you only notice it by the way things in the room move strangely. Biblical Parallax says the Bible works the same way: its contradictions and tensions aren't mistakes, they're the signs pointing toward something too big and too deep for any words to capture directly.
Definition
Biblical Parallax names the structural condition in which the divine source — understood as an impenetrable, unsymbolisable kernel — can only be approached obliquely through the contradictions, fractures, and excesses internal to the biblical text itself, never through any single totalising reading. The term "parallax" (borrowed from optics and astronomy, where the apparent position of an object shifts depending on the observer's vantage point) is deployed here to describe a textual analogue: the Bible's contradictions and narrative inconsistencies are not errors to be harmonised away but are the precise formal indicators of a source that exceeds all its representations. Just as light exhibits wave/particle duality — irreducible to either description alone — the divine is indicated by the irreducible tension between competing textual manifestations. No single perspective, hermeneutic, or theological reading can capture it; it is the gap between readings that points toward what remains.
This structure is explicitly "parallactical" in the sense developed by the source (rollins-peter-the-fidelity-of-betrayal-towards-a-church-beyond-belief-paraclete): the Bible "indirectly draws us toward" rather than transparently delivering its source. The divine is, in this account, both within the words and not contained by them — an excluded interior that the text's very failures and rifts keep marking. This makes any totalising hermeneutics (fundamentalist, historicist, allegorical) structurally impossible by design, not by deficiency. The impossibility is productive: it is precisely the fracture in the text that functions as the trace of what cannot be written.
Place in the corpus
Within rollins-peter-the-fidelity-of-betrayal-towards-a-church-beyond-belief-paraclete, Biblical Parallax functions as the hermeneutical operationalisation of several interlocking Lacanian concepts. Most directly, it is an application of the logic of das Ding: just as das Ding is "at the center only in the sense that it is excluded" — an extimate kernel that the chain of signifiers orbits without ever reaching — the divine source of the Bible is posited as a void-centre that textual representations orbit without capturing. The biblical text becomes the archive of Vorstellungsrepräsentanzen (signifying substitutes) that ceaselessly circle their impossible referent. The concept is equally an application of the Real: the divine source "does not cease not to be written" by the text, which means that the text's contradictions are not merely rhetorical failures but are the formal trace of what resists symbolisation absolutely. The parallax structure is precisely the Symbolic order's constitutive inability to close over itself, the S(Ø) — the gap in the Other — made visible at the level of scripture.
The concept also engages Extimacy and the Sublime. The divine is extimate to the biblical corpus: most intimate to the text (the text is nothing without it), yet radically exterior to any given formulation. The Sublime operates similarly — the text's inadequacy to its source is not a failure but the affirmative mark of an excess that overwhelms representation. The Signifier's role is structural: each biblical signifier "makes a hole" in the real, and it is precisely those holes — the fractures and contradictions — that constitute the parallactical indicator. Biblical Parallax thus acts as a specification and re-application of these canonical Lacanian concepts onto the domain of scripture and theology, arguing that the Bible's formal structure is already, in a sense, Lacanian: built around an impossible, generative, and constitutively absent centre.
Key formulations
The Fidelity of Betrayal: Towards a Church Beyond Belief (page unknown)
To approach the Bible as indirectly drawing us toward an impenetrable source within and yet not contained by the words is to acknowledge its profoundly parallactical structure.
The phrase "impenetrable source within and yet not contained by the words" is theoretically loaded because it articulates the precise topology of extimacy and das Ding: the source is interior ("within") but simultaneously exceeds and eludes containment by the signifying chain — it is the excluded centre, not a transcendent beyond. The word "indirectly" further signals that the approach is structural and oblique (parallactical) rather than hermeneutically direct, ruling out any reading that claims transparent access to the divine.
All occurrences
Where it appears in the corpus (1)
-
#01
The Fidelity of Betrayal: Towards a Church Beyond Belief · Peter Rollins
<span id="title.html_page_iii"></span>THE FIDELITY OF BETRAYAL > <span id="contents.html_page_vii"></span>CONTENTS > <span id="chapter003.html_page_49"></span>The biblical parallax
Theoretical move: The passage argues that the Bible has a "parallactical structure" — analogous to the wave/particle duality of light — whereby the divine source is never directly captured by its textual manifestations but is instead indicated by the contradictions, fractures, and excesses within the narrative itself, making any totalising reading impossible.
To approach the Bible as indirectly drawing us toward an impenetrable source within and yet not contained by the words is to acknowledge its profoundly parallactical structure.